Telangana High Court
WP/4581/2021 of Danasari Padma and 5 others Vs State of Telangana and 4 others on 31 December 2021
TI nr s JSESJfJE DoF rE LAN GANA (Speciat Originat Juris-Aiction; FRIDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECET\,4BER TWO THOUSAND AND rWEIrrV 5iE " "' PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Betwee n: WRIT PETITIO NNO:4581 oF 2021 1. Danasari padma, Wro-_9gTf?irh, 4ggd about
HIGH COURT FOR TIrE LAN GANAnr s JSESJfJE DoF (Speciat Originat Juris-Aiction; FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECET\,4BER"'TWO THOUSAND AND rWEIrrV 5iE "
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITIO NNO:4581 oF 2021
Betwee n:
1. Danasari padma, 2. v.Kannaiah R/o 5-136,21 plT. Sio Rompard, Wro-_9gTf?irh, Sarirm,ai,"1, yellandu, 4ggd Khammam about Urstnct.j0.years, Occ. Housewife,3. Danasari R/o H.No.3-22, 21 [paqididda ]ptr Thitak f.fagai-Romia'ii. Ase_b' ;:ffii: ve]ianou, Khammam ;b yea.r_g, occ. District.Housewife,R;iu...s/o (dil;;;h,"x;"iztout 4e years, R/o 5_136, 212. v.Kannaiah R/o 5-136,21 plT. Sio Rompard, Wro-_9gTf?irh, Sarirm,ai,"1, yellandu, 4ggd Khammam about Urstnct.j0.years, Occ. Housewife,3. Danasari R/o H.No.3-22, 21 [paqididda ]ptr Thitak f.fagai-Romia'ii. Ase_b' ;:ffii: ve]ianou, Khammam ;b yea.r_g, occ. District.Housewife,R;iu...s/o (dil;;;h,"x;"iztout 4e years, R/o 5_136, 21. [prT. ][Rompaid. ][yelanoulKha;m;;b[i;iJt ][',"" ][.^]4. uanasa, Vamshi Saoar, S/o.Komaraiah, Aged about j9 years, Occ. Agriculture,_ [R/o ][5-135, ][21 ][ptr, ][R6mpaio, ][yeilanoul(hlx,]i#"oirtl"i"t.]5 V.Sammakka, w/o velrkalbr;;;ir;*;\A;;'.'olri'ss years, occ. Housewrfe_ [R/o ][5-135, ][21 ][ptr, ][R6mpaio, ][yeilanoul(hlx,]i#"oirtl"i"t.]5 V.Sammakka, w/o velrkalbr;;;ir;*;\A;;'.'olri'ss years, occ. Housewrfe^ [Rto ][12-49, ][Onti Sinsat, SuonimairJ, ][VetE;;u, ][i;;;ram ]District.6, Padiqa Sukkammal wto. pjpiriiu,-&";i';b;;i'55 years, occ. Housewife,6, Padiqa Sukkammal wto. pjpiriiu,-&";i';b;;i'55 years, occ. Housewife,Rl o 1 4-1 4, Lachag udem, yettanO u, i<frarirm b"iliri.t....PETITIONERS...PETITIONERSAND
1.RFIeSI-Tel?nqana,. [Rep. by ][its.principat Secretary, ][Tribat ][Wetfare ][Department,]LJss Bnavan, Owaisipura Road, lrrlasab Tank, Hvderabad.RFIeSI-Tel?nqana,. [Rep. by ][its.principat Secretary, ][Tribat ][Wetfare ][Department,]LJss Bnavan, Owaisipura Road, lrrlasab Tank, Hvderabad.2.State of T^elangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretdry, Energy Department, BRKEnavan, 5atlaoad, Hvderabad.Enavan, 5atlaoad, Hvderabad.3.The Singareni Colleri'es Co. Ltd, Rep. by its Chairman and IVID, SingareniEhav_an, Red Hills, Khairatabad, Hyderdbad.Ehav_an, Red Hills, Khairatabad, Hyderdbad.4.The Commissioner, Rehabilitation'and Resetflement, Govt. Of Telangana,Buddha Bhavan, Secunderabad.Buddha Bhavan, Secunderabad.5.R and R Adminstrator and Joint Collector, Bhadradi Kothagudem District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more so, a Writ in the nature of lt/andamus, bydeclaring the action of the respondents, in not implementing R and R [package ]ascircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more so, a Writ in the nature of lt/andamus, bydeclaring the action of the respondents, in not implementing R and R [package ]asper G.O.l\,4s.No.34, to the petitioners who are affected in the prolect as per theproceedings of the Project Administrator, and Joint Collector, Khammam,dated 19.04.20'16, by declanng the inaction of the [respondents, in not ][implementing]the benefits to the [petitioners, ]as arbitrary, [illegal, ][unlawful, contrary ][to ][law ][and]infringing the rights of the [petitioners, guaranteed under ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia,]and coniequentially, to direct [the ][respondents, ][to ][implement ][the ][R ][and ][R ][package,]to [family ][members of ][the petitioners, and ][house plots.]by providing employment dated 19.04.20'16, by declanng the inaction of the [respondents, in not ][implementing]the benefits to the [petitioners, ]as arbitrary, [illegal, ][unlawful, contrary ][to ][law ][and]infringing the rights of the [petitioners, guaranteed under ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia,]and coniequentially, to direct [the ][respondents, ][to ][implement ][the ][R ][and ][R ][package,]to [family ][members of ][the petitioners, and ][house plots.]by providing employment IA NO: 10F 2021
Petition under Section [151 ][cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed [in ][support of ][the ][petition, ][the ][High Court may be pleased ][to ][direct]the respondents to [consider ][the ][implementation ].of [R ][and ][R ][package ][as ][per]G'o.tvts,No.g+'aSpertherepresentationofthepetitionersdated02,02.202l,duringthe [pendency ][of ][the ][above ][writ petition]
Counsel for the [Petitioner ][: ][SRI G. ][VASANTHA ][RAYUDU]a;;;;;i for the [Respondent ][Nos'1, 4 ][,5: GP ][FoR ][SoclAL ][WELFARE]Counsel for the [Respondent ][No.2: ][GP ][FOR ][ENERGY]ior"i"f for the [Respondent ][No.3: ][SRI ][J'SREENIVAS RAO' ][SC ][FOR ][SCCL]The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER ]
REGISTRAR
V.P.No.45 81 of2021
ORDE
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel oneither side fairly conceded that the issue involved in this writpetition is squarely covered by the order dated 27 .L2.2021 passed bythis Court in W.P.No.18748 of 2018.
Following the order dated 27.12.2021 in W.p.No.1g74g of2018, and lbr reasons alike, this Writ petition is also disposed of.No costs.No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, ifany, shall stand closed.
t
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:3111212021
ORDERWP.No.4581 of 2021
DISPOSING OF THE WPWITHOUT COSTS
:r/ti -2 4 lm zaziz\i. *./.\..,\..?,
THE HON'BTE SRI JUSIICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVITI
W2 IIP19 TIIION No0I 2 .187148o 2 of00 919 ot2018260f,loz942ott0t9
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
As the issue roised in oll these writ pelitions is one ond lhesome, oll lhese writ pelitions ore being disposed of by woy of thiscommon order2For the soke of convenience, the focts in W.p.No.1B/48 of2018 ore discussed hereunder:-
3. W.P.No.lB/48 of 20lg is filed seeking the following relief :- ,,..... to issue a writ, order or direction and more particul.arl.yone in the nature of writ of Mandamus dectaring the action of theRespondent No.4 the issuance of Notification videRef.No.CRp/pER/R /2017 /5A1 /1, dated 27.07.?017 for the posts ofBadti Workers (under ground) Recruitment of NCWA Cadre posts forSchedule Tribes of Telangana State under Speciat Recruitment Drjve(Externat) without considering the Schedute Tribes project DisptacedFamities (5T PDF) is ittegat, arbitrary and vjotative of the rightsguaranteed by the Constitution of lndia and consequentty direct the4th Respondent to fitt the ST vacancies wjth the Scheduled TribesProject Disptaced Farhities (ST pDF) and left over posts may be fittedwith other Schedute Tribe candidates.....,,.
4. Heord Sri Ch.Venkot Romon, Ms.K.V.Rojo Sree ondSri Korunokor Reddy, leorned counsel oppeoring for the pelitioners,Sri A.Sonjeev Kumor. leorned Speciol Government pleoderrepreseniing Sri J.Srinivqs Roo, leorned Stonding Counsel oppeoringfor the respondents ond Sri M.Surender Roo, leorned Senior Counseloppeoring for ihe impleoded respondents.
5. lt hos been conlended by the petitioners thoi ihey ore olldisploced persons ond their londs were ocquired by the respondentcompony for mining octivity ond the Stote Government hos loken opolicy decision vide G.O.Ms.No.34, doted 28.04.2010, to provide /
ond [theY ][belonged ][to]employmenl [to][ the ][disPloced ][Persons]Scheduled [Tribe ][communitY]the Petitioners [hod]6. Leorned [counsel ][oPPeoring ][for]. issued [bY ][the ][Stote]contended [thot ][controry ][io ][the ][soid ][G'O]Governmenr, [the ][respondents ][ore not ][providing ][ony ][employmenl]to the [petitioners' ][The ][petitioners ][hove been ][submitting ][series ][of]representotions [requesting ][ihe ][respondents ][to ][consider ][ihelr ][coses]for oppointment [to ][the ][post ][of ][Bodli workers' ][but the ][respondents]hove [not ][possed ][ony ][orders' ][Finolly' ][the ][respondents ][hove ][possed]o Resolution [in iis ][Boord ][Meeting held ][on ][2905'2013' ][wherein ihe]respondent [ComPonY,][ in ][principol, ][hod ][decided ][to ][implement]G.O.Ms.No.34, [doted ][2834'2010 ][ond ][consider ][the ][coses ][of ][the]petitioners for oppoinlment [io ][the ][post ][of ][Bodli ][workers']7. Leorned counsel [oppeoring ][for the ][petilioners ][hod]contended thot [when ][the ][respondents ][ore not ][complying ][the]Resolution [possed by ][the respondent ][compony' ][some ][persons ][hove]filed W.P.Nos.32B6B [of ][2017 ][ond ][41342 ][ot ][2017 ][ond ][ihis ][Courl]ollowed the soid writ [petitions ][ond ][direcled the ][respondenls ][to]implement G.O.Ms.No.34 [doted ][28.04.2010 ][within ][o ][period ][of ][three]months from the dote [of ][receipt ][of ][o copy ][of the ][order. ][Aggrieved]thereby, the respondents hove [filed ][W.A.Nos.1297 ][of ][20lB ][ond ][l29B]of 20lB before o Division Bench of this Court ond the [Hon'ble]Division Bench wos [pleosed ]to dismiss the [writ ]oppeols [vide ][order]doted 29.10.2018.B. Leorned counsel oppeoring for ihe [petilioners ]hod [further]conlended thot the respondents hove further conied the molter [in]oppeol before the Hon'ble lhe Supreme Court by filing SLP Nos.6586
ond 6582 of 2Ol9 ond ihe Hon,ble Supreme Court wos pleosed todismiss the soid oppeols vide order doied 1.l.03.2019. As the orderpossed by the leorned Singre Judge of ihis court hqs become finor,the respondents ore bound to consider the cose of the peiilionersfor oppointmeni to ihe post of Bodri workers in terms ofG.O.Ms.No.34 doied 28.04.201 0.9. Leorned counsel oppeoring for lhe petilioners hod furthercontended thol insteod of considering lhe coses of the petitionersfor oppoinlmeni lo ihe post of Bodli workers, the respondenls hoveissued recruitment Notificotion on 27,07.2012, wherein cin ottempt isbeing mode to fill up the post with generol ST condidotes insteod ofconsidering lhe coses of lhe petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.34doted 28.04.2010. Chollenging the some, the present writ petiiionsore filed.
,l0. Leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioners hod furthercontended thot in oll lhere ore 2900 voconcies of Bodli workers ondthe respondents hove issued recruitmenl Notifico'tion for filling up665 voconcies of Bodli workers. Since the order [possed ]by ihis Courthod become finol right upto the Supreme Courl, the respondentsore bound io consider the cose of [peiitioners for ][oppoinlment ][to]the post of Bodli workers in terms of [the judgmenl ][of ][this ][Courl ][in]W.P.Nos.32B68 oI 2017 ond 41342 of 2017 doted [10.08.2018 ][od ][poss]oppropriote orders in occordonce [with ][low.]I l. Leorned Speciol Government [Pleoder oppeoring ][for ][the]respondenls hod contended [thot ][neorly ][260 ][posts ][were ][filled ][up]with disploced [persons ]ond [the ][petitioners ][ore ][not quolified ][for ][the]posl of Bodli workers. Hence, the coses [of the ][petitioners ][could ][not]
be considered [for ][oppoinlment to ][ihe ][posl ][of ][Bodli workers ][in ][terms]of G.O.Ms.No.34 [doted ][28'04'2010' ][The NoUficoiion ][wos ][issued ][on]27.07.2017 [to ][fill ][up ][the ][Bodli ][workers ][from ][the omong ][the ][scheduled]tribecondidotes.Thepetitionersorenotcomingwithinthezoneofconsiderotion [for oppointment ][to ][the ][post ][of ][Bodli workers ][os ][per]G'o.Ms.No.34doted28'04.20l0.Hence,thecosesofthepetitionerscoutd not be considered [for ][oppointmenl ][to ][ihe ][post ][of ][Bodli]workers in lerms of G.O.Ms.No.34, [doted ][28.04.2010' He ][hod ][furlher]contended thot the [respondenl ][Compony hod ][issued ][proceedings]doted 13.08.20i9, wherein o [decision wos ][token by the ][respondent]Compony thol the coses of the [petitioners will ][be ][considered ][in ][the]lefl over voconcies. The respondent compony, in [principol, ]hostoken o decision to provide employment to scheduled tribe [project]disploced fomilies ond would consider the coses of the pelitionersin terms of G.O.Ms.No.34 doted 28.04.2010.
12. Leorned Senior counsel oppeoring for the impleodedrespondents hod contended thot 665 voconcies, which werenoiified vide Notificotion doted 27 .07 .2017 ore to be filled upexclusively by scheduled lribe condidotes ond the petilionersconnot stoll the recruitmeni process, which is iniiioted in pursuonceof Notificotion doted 21 .07.2017 ond this Court gronted inlerimdirection on 07.06.2018, wherein this Court hod directed thot iheexominotion scheduled to be held on [,i0.06.201g ]moy go on.However, the results sholl not be onnounced ond becouse of theinierim order, lhe cose of lhe impleoded respondents is not beingconsidered for oppoinlmenl to the post of Bodri workers. Therefore,oppropriote orders be possed in the wril petilion direcling lhe officioi respondenls lo fiil up the notified voconcies in pursuonce oflhe Notificotion doled 27.07.201/ ond poss oppropriote orders inoccordonce wilh low.lhe Notificotion doled 27.07.201/ ond poss oppropriote orders inoccordonce wilh low.
13. This courl, hoving considered the rivor submissions mode bythe porties, is of ihe considered view thot ihe pelilioners belong toscheduled tribe communily ond they ore disploced persons ondlhe respondenl compony hos token o decision vide Resorutiondoled 29.05.2013, wherein the respondent Compony in principolhod decided to implement G.O.Ms.No.34 dated 28.04.2010 ond thisCourt wos pleosed 1o ollow W.P.Nos.32B6B of 2a17 ond 41342 ot2017 doted 10.08.2018 ond directed lhe respondenls to complyG.O.Ms.No.34 doted 28.04.2010 ond lhe soid orders were upheldright upto lhe Supreme Court.
14. Therefore, the respondenls ore directed to consider the coseof the [petitioners ]for oppointmeni to the [post ]of bodli workers sirictlyin terms of G.O.Ms.No.34 doted 28.04.2010 by duly [ioking ][into]occount the [proceedings ]doted [13.08.2019 ][issued ][by ][the]respondent Compony ond [poss ][oppropriote ][orders ][in ][occordonce]with low. The respondenls ore ot [liberly ][to ][go ][oheod ][wiih ][the]recruilment [process ][pursuont ][io ][Notificotion ][doled ][27 .07 ][.2017 ][.]
15. With the obove [directions, ][the ][writ ][pelilions ][ore ][disposed of']No costs.
Pending miscelloneous [peiitlons, ][if ][ony, ][sholl ][stond closed']
ABHINAND [KUMAR SHAVILI, ][J]