WP/46646/2022 of J. Vijay Kumar and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others on 30 December 2022

[ [3168 ]]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMANWRIT PETITION NO: 46646 OF 2o22

Between:

1 . {. Vijay Kumar, s/o. Bhagavan Rao, lndian, Aged 50 years, Fyo. 1-77,Bairapoor Village, Birkoor [\/andal, Kamareddy Distiict.Bairapoor Village, Birkoor [\/andal, Kamareddy Distiict.

2. J. Bairapoor Village, Birkoor Mandal, Kamareddy Sangeetha, w/o. J. Vijay Kumar, lndiair , Dis[rict.Aged 42 years, Fyo. 1-77,3. J. Subhadra, w/o. Bhagavan Rao, lndian, Aged 70 years, Rl/o. 1-77,BairapoorVillage,BirkoorMandal,KamareddyDislrict.

...pETlTlONERS

AND1

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Secretariat. Hyderabad.The District Collector, Kamareddy, Kamaredy District.The Tahsildar, Birkoor l\,4andal, Kamareddy District.

234

The Assistant Director (Survey), Kamareddy District, Kamareddy.

..,RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in notthe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in notconducting survey pursuant to the F-Line Application Numbers AA5910386,AA59'10379 and AA59'1 0383 dated 2411112022 as illegat, null, void and arbitraryand consequently direct the respondents to conduct the survey for the petitionersand consequently direct the respondents to conduct the survey for the petitionerslands situated at Bairapoor Village as per F-Line Application dated 2411112022.lA NO: 1 OF 2022lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the Respondents to conduct survey of petitioners lands pursuant to the F-Line Applications Nos. AA5910386, AA5S10379 and AAS910383 dated2411112022 forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition.Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. DURGA PRASADCounsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR REVENUEThe Court made the following: ORDER

rI:)N'BLE SRI.ILISTICE K. LAKSII]V ,\NWF2O2?

oR_,\t_ [()ttDI]ti:

Heard l,.arned counsel for. the petitioners and l:arned Assistant(iovcntment )leader for Revenue appearing on Lrehalf of thclespondents

2. I'he petitioners herein ar.e claiming thar petit oner No. I is theabsolute orvnt r and possessor of the agriculhrre land atlmeasuringAcs.7.00 guntrs in Suney Nos.4 l/2, 42/l/1, 4Z|ZAAtlllllllll and133/1, petition:r No.2 is owner and possessor of the tr.nd a<lmeasuringAcs.l7.20 gur ras in Survey Nos.7/3, 106, 135, 1_lri and 137 andpetition!-r No..; is the orvner and possessor ol the lancl a<lmeasuringAcs. l7.2tl gun.as in Survey Nos. 133, 134, 135, 136 and l-t7, situatedrl Ilairapoor \ illage, Birkoor Mandal, Kamarecldy Districr. In proolot'tlrc sanrc. thlv have filed photostat copies of l_B F,rrrns (l{OR) andlatest pattadar pass books. They have submitted F_t ine applicationsvicie I"l'D 1R022200866283, 'mDER022200ti66250. andI I l)Irl{01220,)9(16267. dated 24. I 1 .2022 with r.esporrdcnr Nos.2 and.l with a reque it to conduct survey of the aforesaid. f ,espite recciving Z

and acknowledging the said F-line applications, respondent [Nos.2 ][and]3 did not act upon the same. Therefore, the present writ [petition]3 did not act upon the same. Therefore, the present writ [petition]

3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader lorRcvenue. on instructions, would submit that respondents wilI consider'the applicatior-rs of the petitioners herein and pass necessary ordersthereon.

4. In view of thc above, this writ petition is disposcd ofdirecting rcspondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider the aforesaid F-lineapplications dated 24.11.2022 submitted by the petitioners and passappropriatc ordcrs in accordance '"vith larv by putting 1he petitionersherein and all alfected persons on notice and affording thenr ar.ropportunit), ol hearing. If respondent Nos.3 and 4 are not inclincd toconsider the requests of the petitioners,, they shall give spt'cilicreasons to that eliect. They shall communicate a copy of the o|der tothe pctitioners. ['l'hey ]shalI complete the entire exercise [u'ithin ]lbrtlfir,e [(.1-5) ]dar,s t'orn the date olreceipt of copy olthis order. Hou,s'cr.thcrc shall bc no order as to [costs.]

\

As a s :quel, the miscellaneous petitions. if ar v. pending in thewrit petition ;hall stand closed.

SDi-A.V,S.PRASADASS,ISiTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//( 1L:-SECTION OFFICER

To,1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, The Sta er of lelangana,Secretariat, l- yderabad.

2. The District C ollector, Kamareddy, Kamaredy District.

3. The Tahsilda , Birkoor Mandal, Kamareddy District.

4. The Assistan Director (Survey), Kamareddy District, Ka-rrarecldy.

Ka-rrarecldy.5. One CC to Sltl K. DURGA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUC]6. Two CCs to [( ]iP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Sta e of [-I'etangana]tourl

7. Two CD Copi :sBNGJPkKs

HIGH COUTIT

DATED:301' 2111022