Telangana High Court
WP/7074/2004 of Kuragayala Lingamma, Vs The Executive Officer, on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 7074 of 2004 Between: Kuragayala Lingamma, W/o K. Lachmaiah, R/o H.No. 7-2-113, Badde
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 7074 of 2004
Between:
Kuragayala Lingamma, W/o K. Lachmaiah,R/o H.No. 7-2-113, Badde Pochamma Street,Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Executive Officer, Sri Raja Rajeswara SwamyDevasthanam, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District. Devasthanam, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.
2 The Commissioner of Endowments, A.P, Hyderabad.
3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue(Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
4 Smt. K. Bhagyamma, W/o Nampally,. C/o Konda Laxmirajam, H.No. 1-3-75, Vasavinagar, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamusdeclaring that the petitioner is entitled for compassionate appointment and alsothe pension, death-cum-retirement Gratuity and other pensionary benefitsconsequent on the death of her late husband Sri K. Lachmaiah, Gardener, SriRaja Rajeswara Swamy Devasthanam, Vemulawada while in service on 24-11-2001 with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents innot considering her case for compassionate appointment and also for death-cum-retirement benefits of her late husband without any justification orreasonable cause on the untenable ground that the 4th respondent is alsoclaiming the said benefits vide Lr.No. A2/2641/2001, dated 15-3-2004 issued by the Executive Officer, Sri Raja Rajeswara Swamy Devasthanam, Vemulawadaread with Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Devasthanam No. 39,dated 16-3-2004 is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14 and21 of the Constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural justice,equity and fair play.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.LINGA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: MR RAVI KONDAVETI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter before the Registry on27.12.2004 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writpetition. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order asto costs.
28[th] December, 2004
ka
________________
B. Prakash Rao, J
To
1 The Executive Officer, Sri Raja Rajeswara SwamyDevasthanam, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.
2 The Commissioner of Endowments, A.P, Hyderabad.
3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue(Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 2CCs to Government Pleader for Endowments, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT)
5 2CD copies