Telangana High Court
AS/675/2008 of P. Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs L.Vishnu Gowd (Died per LR RR2 to 4) on 31 December 2024
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY , THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT No: b75 0F 2008 [ 3208 ] ...AppellanUPlaintiff Appeal filed under Section 96 of C P C ' against the Judgment and
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE [THIRry ][FIRST ][DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND TWENTY ][FOUR]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SMT. ][JUSTICE ][P.SREE ][SUDHA]
APPEAL[SUIT No:][ b75 ][0F ][2008]
filed [under Section ][96 of ][C ][P ][C ]' [against ][the ][Judgment and ][decree]Appeal daled 27_7-20O7 [passed ][i"'-oi. ][r.rl. ][101 ][of ][2003 ][on ][the ][file of ][the ][court ][of ][the ][lV]Additional [District and ][S".tloinJL'Jge' ][(Fast ][Track Court)' Ranga Reddy District']
Between:
P. Ashok [Kumar Yadav, ][S/o ][P ][Komuraiah Yadav' ][Age: ][34 ][years' R/o' ][2316-]703/A, Shah-AIi-Banda, [HYderabad']
...AppellanUPlaintiff
AND
1L. Vishnu Gowd [(Died per LR ][RR2 ][to ][4), ][S/o ][Viswanath Gowd R/o. H ][No ][16-]7 t -tiisn. Gaddidnnardm. [Hyderabad']7 t -tiisn. Gaddidnnardm. [Hyderabad']
L. Sukanva, [[W/o. ]][[Late L. Vishnu ]][Goud, ][Major'-R/o ][Flat ][No ][501' Sai ][Unique]h"Iii"i"'v,'xli""uagh, [[Saioauad, Hvderabad-500 ]][[059]]h"Iii"i"'v,'xli""uagh, [[Saioauad, Hvderabad-500 ]][[059]]
2L. Sukanva, [[W/o. ]][[Late L. Vishnu ]]h"Iii"i"'v,'xli""uagh, [[Saioauad, Hvderabad-500 ]][[059]]h"Iii"i"'v,'xli""uagh, [[Saioauad, Hvderabad-500 ]][[059]]JL. Ramanianeyulu, [S/o. ][Late ][L ][Vishnu ][Goud' ][Major' ][R/o' ][Flat ][No ][501' ][Sai]u"iq;;'H$iA;;;v, [riirnuign, ][saidabad, ][Hvderabad-S0o ][05e]u"iq;;'H$iA;;;v, [riirnuign, ][saidabad, ][Hvderabad-S0o ][05e]4L. Chandraleka, [D/o. Late ][L. ][Vishnu Goud, Aged ][l-Vlajol ][R/o ][Flat ][No ][501' ][Sai]Uri,i;;'R;id;cv,kJranoagn, [Saidabad, ][Hv-derabad-500 059]Uri,i;;'R;id;cv,kJranoagn, [Saidabad, ][Hv-derabad-500 059]
(Resoondent Nos. 2 to 4 are brought on record- [as^per Court Order ][dated]\a.o51o2i vide lA [No.3 ][ol ][2023 ][in ][A.S-No ][675 ][of ][2008)]\a.o51o2i vide lA [No.3 ][ol ][2023 ][in ][A.S-No ][675 ][of ][2008)]
...ResPondents [Nos. ][2 ][to ][4]
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2008[(ASMP. ]NO: [1768 O][F ][2008)]
Petition under order 39 [Rule ][1 ][of ][cPC ][praying ][that in the ][circumstances]stated in the affidavit filed [in ][support ][of the ][petition, ][the ][High Court may ][be]pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining [the ][respondent ][from ][alienating]ihe [suit schedule property admeasuring ][266 ][Sq. ][yards]or otherwisd encumbering bearing No. H.No. 7-1218 situated [at ][Gaddinnaram, the then Hayathnagar ][Taluq,]Gaddiannnaram Municipality, [Ranga Reddy District ][(suit ][Schedule property ][in]O.S. No. 10'l of 2003 on the file of the [lV ][Additional ][District ][and ][Sessions Judge](Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District), [pending ]disposal [of ][the ][appeal]
Counsel for the Appellant :
Sri V. Venkata Ramana (Not present)
Counsel for the Respondents
Sri Thoom Srinivas
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE [SUDHA]
APPEAL SUIT No.675 of [2OO8]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
This appeal suit is filed against the [judgment and ][decree]dated 27.O7.2007 passed in O.S.No.101 [of ][2OO3 ][on ][the ][file ][of IV]Additional District & Sessions Judge [(FTC), ][Ranga ][Reddy]District.
2. Suit for.specific perlormance [filed ][in ][the ][year ][2003 ][was]dismissed rn 2OO7 against which [plaintiff ][in ][the ][suit ][preferred]this appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the [respondcnt ][present.]
4. No representation on behalf of [the ][appellant ][even ][after]listing the matter under the [caption ]["for ][dismissal" and failed ][to]evince any interest in [continuing ][the ][appeal. ][Therefore, ][no]purpose is served in continuing the appeal.
5. Accordingly appeal suit [is dismissed for ][non-prosecution']r As a sequel, miscellaneous [petitions, pending ][if ][any, ][sha]
stand closedl
Sd/. K. [S]LESHITRARDEPUTY [REG]SECTION [OFFICER]
/ffRUE [COPY//]
To,The lV Additional [District ][and ][Sessions ][Judge' ][(Fast ][Track Court)' ][Ranga]ReddY District.2. One [CC ][to ][Sri V. ][Venkata Ramana' Advocate ][[OPUC]]
i On" [CC ][to ][Sri ][Thoom Srinivas' Advocate ][[OPUC]]
4. Two [CD CoPies]Njb[gh]crv
HIGH COUR.T
DATED:31 112t2024
JUDGMENTAS.No.675 of 2008
DISMISSING THE APPEALFOR NON-PROSECUTION
o$lu
..\{/ \'l '^i \I! ,\;:)i,1..,:IO;{ llr 21125C)*[rt]t(-rt)ESp,:, C',,\