Telangana High Court
WP/23493/2009 of Satyapal, Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, on 31 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23493 of 2009 Between: Satyapal, at Milestone, 2nd Floor, Road No.10,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 23493 of 2009
Between:
Satyapal, at Milestone, 2nd Floor, Road No.10, Banjarahills,Rep. by its Partner, Rejiv Shroff, S/o.Shree Vant Shroff, R/o.House No.93, Road No.14, Banjarahills, Hyderabad.
..... Petitioner
AND
1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep., By its Special Officer& Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.& Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
2. The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement, Greater HyderabadMunicipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Municipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
3. U.S.M.Business Systems Private Limited, R/o.1-8-31/2, Patigadda Road, behind Ford showroom,Secunderabad.Secunderabad.
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OFMANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the notices on 25-03-2009 vide proceedings No.245/AD1/Advt/GHMC/2008-2009 in serial No.9878under Section 421 R/w section 622 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 treatingthe name Board/board frames fixed by the Petitioner on the parapet wall of itsbusiness place and consequently demanding the fee for the same is illegal,arbitrary, capricious and in violation of the principles of natural justice; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI SESHADRI GOALLA,Advocate for the Petitioner and of Smt. Kalpana Ekbote, S.C. for GHMC for therespondents 1 and 2, the Court made the following:
ORDER: Post on 11-11-2009.
In the meanwhile, the respondents shall not levy any fee against the petitionerin respect of any hoard or advertisement, if it is erected in the same placewhere the petitioner is undertaking any activity.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Special Officer & Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad MunicipalCorporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
2. The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement, Greater HyderabadMunicipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.Municipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.
3. U.S.M.Business Systems Private Limited, R/o.1-8-31/2, Patigadda Road, behind Ford showroom,Secunderabad.( 1 to 3 by RPAD)R/o.1-8-31/2, Patigadda Road, behind Ford showroom,Secunderabad.( 1 to 3 by RPAD)
4. One C.C.to Sri Seshadri Goalla Advocate. (OPUC)
5. One C.C.to Smt. Kalpana Ekbote Advocate. (OPUC)
6. one spare copy.
HIGH COURT
LNR.J
DATED 2-11-2009
POST ON 11-11-2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
W.P.NO. 23493 OF 2009
DIRECTION
BsrDt. 3-11-2009
LNR.J
DATED 2-11-2009
POST ON 11-11-2009
ORDER
W.P.NO. 23493 OF 2009