Telangana High Court
WP/37221/2021 of Rasakatla Madanaiah Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., And 2 Others on 31 December 2021
THE S' ; ;" ", j,C[iffi{lfl [:: A N G A N A '-''1{r'Ji,r'5,[ln !, ii,t H,l.R',i Bi,E' u o THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO:372210F2 021 Between: AND $;iilil}ffi ,.jfl?i,ffi,4{5T,iti.iiit,f ","JI"
HIGH COURT FOR THE S'; ;" ", [j,C[iffi{lfl ][[::A ]
N G A N A
'-''1{r'Ji,r'5,[ln u o!, ii,t H,l.R',i Bi,E'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO:372210F2 021
Between:
$;iilil}ffi ,.jfl?i,ffi,4{5T,iti.iiit,f ","JI" [jJ,#T:l8i"";J""ttil]
, ..PETITIONER
AND
1. The Sinqareni Collieries,Company Ltd., Rep. Director Kothagudem xhammiri ol.iii.i]" by its [", ]"' Chairman and 'lr,4anagingThe Sinqareni Collieries,Company Ltd., Rep. Director Kothagudem xhammiri ol.iii.i]" by its [", ]"' Chairman and 'lr,4anaging
2. The Sup_erintendent of l{i1es, The S^ing^areni Collieries Company Ltd. RK_6lncline, Srirampur Area Srirampur SO+"SOj, lvancieriaf Oistlncline, Srirampur Area Srirampur SO+"SOj, lvancieriaf Oist
3. The General lr/anaoer. flg.Sln.garent Collieries Company Ltd., RK_6 lncline,Srirampur Area IVa"ncherial Dis#ict. T S.- [- ][-- ][-"]Srirampur Area IVa"ncherial Dis#ict. T S.- [- ][-- ][-"]
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased tocall for the records from the Respondents and issue an appropriate writ or order ordirection particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of thecall for the records from the Respondents and issue an appropriate writ or order ordirection particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of theRespondents in not considering the case of my second Son Rasakatla Arun foremployment under medical invalidation scheme as illegal, unjust, contrary to law andin violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and grant allconsequential benefits.employment under medical invalidation scheme as illegal, unjust, contrary to law andin violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and grant allconsequential benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct ][the]Respondents to consider the [application ][submitted ][on ][271312018 ][for ][providing]employment to my son [Rasakatla Arun forthwith.]
Counsel for the Petitioner: [SRI ][A. ][K. ][JAYAPRAKASH ][RAO]
Counsel for the Respondents: [SRI ][J.SRINIVASA ][RAO, SC ][FOR SCC]
The Court made the [following: ][ORDER]
THE HOI''BLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][ABHINAND ][KUMAR ][SHAVILI]
,lWR IT[PET][lTl][ON No][.37]1f0
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ [p:tition ][is ][being ][disposed ][of ][ot ][the ][odmission stoge]wjth the [consen ][of ][both ][Porties']
This writ [p ][;iition ][is ][filed ][seeking ][the ][tollowing ][relief ][:]
"....... [tr ][ca[[ ][for ][the ][records ][from ][the ][respondents ][and]issue ar appropriate [writ ][or ][order ][or direction ][particutarty]oneinllenatureofMandamusdectaringtheactionol.therespon( [3nts ][in ][not ][considering ][the ][case ][of ][my ][second ][son]Rasakal .a Arun [for ][emptoyment ][under medical invatidation]scheme [as ][ittegat uniust contrary ][to ][law ][and ][in ][viotatirrn of]Articte: ['14 '16 ][and 21 ][of the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][and ][grant]att con: equential [benefits ]["']
Heord S i A.K'Joyoprokosh [Roo, ][leorned ][counsel ][cppeqring]for the [petitior er ][ond ][Sri ][J.Srinivoso ][Roo, ][leorned ][StonCing ][Counsel]oppeoring for he [resPondents.]
11 5q5 $e€n contended [by ][the ][petitioner ][thot ][he ][is ][o ][retired]Mining Sirdor c nd he hos submitted [o ][deloiled ][represertotion ][1o ][.ihe]respondents ct 27.03.2018 seeking employmenl [to ][his ][son. ][Bu'i. ][so]for, the respc ndents hove not [possed ]ony [orders ][on ][the ][soid]represenlotior.
Therefor :, leorned counsel oppeoring for ihe [p,etitioner ][hod]conlended th:t oppropriote orders be [possed ][in ][the wril ][petition]directing the r :spondents lo consider the representot [on submilted]by ihe [petiti( ]ner on 27.03.2018 ond [poss ]oppropri,rte [orders ][in]occordonce r [u ]iih low.
Leornec Stonding Counsel oppeoring for the respondents hod contendr,d thot the [petiiioner ]hod eorlier filed [h/,P.No.6972 ]of2021 seeking r orrection of doie of birth ond lhis Cou11 wos [pleosed]
to ollow lhe wril petilion vide order dqted 26.03.2012 Ond ogoinslthe soid order, the respondenls hove preferred W.A.No.ZSZ of 2Ol2ond so for no orders hove been possed in the soid Writ Appeol ondthe some is pending. Therefore, the respondents ore not in oposifion to poss oppropriote orders on the representotion submittedby the petitioner.
Leorned counser oppeoring for the peiitioner hod contendedthot though ihe respondenis hove preferred writ oppeol ogoinsl theiudgment of leorned Single Judge, no stoy wos gronted in the soidwrit Appeol. Therefore, the respondents moy be directed ioconsider the cose of the petiiioner ond poss oppropriote orders inoccordonce wilh iow on the represenlolion submitted by thepetitioner on 27.03.201 B.
This Courl, hoving considered ihe rivol submissions mode bythe porlies, is of lhe considered view thot this writ petition con bethe porlies, is of lhe considered view thot this writ petition con bedisposed of direcling the respondenls to consider therepresentotion submilled by the petltioner on 27.03.2018 ond possoppropriote orders in occordonce wiih low, within o reosonobleperiod, preferobly within o period of elght weeks from the dote ofreceipl of o copy of this order.oppropriote orders in occordonce wiih low, within o reosonobleperiod, preferobly within o period of elght weeks from the dote ofreceipl of o copy of this order.
Wiih the obove directions, the wrlt [peiition ][is ][disposed ][of. ][No]costs.Pending miscelloneous [peliiions, ][if ][ony, ][sholl ][stond ][closed']
SD/.K.ONESIMASSISTANi [REGISTRAR]( /ITRUE [COPY//]llt..)SECTION [OFFICER]
To,1ll?^:i3[ffi [I ][ftil:..Ylfl:ffi ]['sP'Director' ]
sinsareni [corrienes ][companv ][Ltd]:fi :'B:$"'vLtdRK'6
NPJ
sBol
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 [l'1212121]
ORDER
WP.No.3722'l <'f 2021
DISPOSING OT THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COS TS.
IrAE [li ][i4 ]J .f$ti^/\a::jij;: I JAit [2022]:..