Telangana High Court
WA/2087/2004 of M/s. Sree Rao Electricals Works, Vs Board of Trustees, on 28 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2087 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICEand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2087 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated05/03/2004 in WVMP NO.313 of 2004 against W.P.M.P.NO.21257 & 21258 of 2003in W.P.No.17122 of 2003 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
M/s. Sree Rao Electricals Works, A 1/6, M.C. Complex Stadium Road,Vishakapatnam, rep by its Authorised Signatory Sri A. Sundaraiah, S/o. A. Yesudas
..... APPELLANT
AND
1 Board of Trustees, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Rep its Chairman Tirupathi, Rep its Chairman 2 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Rep its Executive Officer.
3 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Rep its Chief Engineer 4 Divisional Engineer (Elec), Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi.
5 Superintending Engineer-(Electrical), Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi.
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant: MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU, SC FOR TTD
The Court at the admission stage made the following :
ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice)
Vacating the interim order by learned single Judge is by a reasoned orderwhich is under challenge in this appeal and we see no reason to interfere with suchan order in a contractual matter. Appellant has got other remedies open to it, which itcan avail in accordance with law.
Appeal dismissed.
___________________
DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ
28-12-2004
_____________________
M.NARAYANA REDDY, J
tvr
To
1 Board of Trustees, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Rep its Chairman 2 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Rep its Executive Officer.
3 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Rep its Chief Engineer 4 Divisional Engineer (Elec), Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi. Tirupathi.
5 Superintending Engineer-(Electrical), Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi.
6 Two CCs to the S.O., W.F. Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
7 Two CCs to the S.O., Posting Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
8 Two CD Copies