Telangana High Court
WP/23729/2005 of S.Uma Maheswara, Vs The District Collector, on 26 December 2005
SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23729 OF 2005 Between: S. Uma Maheswara, S/o. Nagalingaiah, aged 40 years, Occ: Weaver, R/o.H.No.1-2-10, Uravakonda, Anatapur District. .. Petitioner AND The District Collector, Anatapur and 4 others ..
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HONOURABLE SRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.23729 OF 2005
Between:S. Uma Maheswara, S/o. Nagalingaiah,aged 40 years, Occ: Weaver, R/o.H.No.1-2-10,Uravakonda, Anatapur District.
.. PetitionerAND.. Respondents::ORDER::
The District Collector, Anatapurand 4 others Counsel for the petitioner :Mr. K. Jaganmohan ReddyCounsel for Respondents 1 & 2 : G.P. for Panchayat RajCounsel for Respondents 3 & 5 : Mr. K. Upender ReddyCounsel for Respondent No.4 : Mr. S.V. Ramana 26th December, 2005
Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ
This petition has been filed in public interest for taking action against Sarpanchand Ward Member of Uravakonda Grama Panchayat, Uravakonda, AnantapurDistrict, for the alleged misconduct committed by them by using panchayat landfor construction of a commercial complex.
Learned Government Pleader says that after taking cognizance of thecomplaints received against them, the competent authority has suspended theSarpanch and Panchayat Secretary and the entire record has been seized bythe District Panchyat Officer.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner says that in view of the submissionmade by the learned Government Pleader, the writ petition may be disposed ofas infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
While disposing of the writ petition in the manner indicated above, we giveliberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition in public interest if any suchcontingency arises in future.
G.S. SINGHVI, C.J.Date:26-12-2005
PV/vtv
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J