Telangana High Court
CRP/1/2016 of RAJENDER KUMAR Vs SHRAVAN BADRUKA AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 1 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 ol tl\e Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 1 OF 2016
Petition under Article 227 ol tl\e Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdated 26.10.2015 in R.A.No.174 of 2014 on the fite of the court of the Addl. chiefJudge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
Ra,jender Kumar, S/o. Late Babulal, aged 4l years, Occ: Business in premisesNo. 1 5-9-481, Mehboobgunj, Hyderabad.No. 1 5-9-481, Mehboobgunj, Hyderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONERYRESPONDENT
AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. lr,4ukundlal Badruka, aged 42 years, Occ: Business
2. Shyam Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, aged 4j years, Occ: Business,Shyam Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, aged 4j years, Occ: Business, Both Rl/o. H.No.8-2-686/9/9 & 10, Road NO. 12,Banjara Hiils, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT
CRPMP. NO: 1 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to suspend the orderthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to suspend the orderpassed in RA No. 174 ol 2014 dated: 26-10-2015 passed by the Hon'ble AdditionalChief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DAMODAR MUNDRA
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI R. A. ACHUTHANAND
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON']tLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIV L REVISION PETITION NO.1 OF 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned c runsel for the petitioner submits that the matterhas been settle I between the [parties ]and, therefore, the CivilRevision Petition may be dismissed.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as inf: uctuous.
There shr ll be no order as to costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if a-ry, pending shall stand dismissed. \
SD/.N.CHANDRA [SEKHAR RAO]ASSISTANTREGISTRAR [./']t\ \,,/,-- ,TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Additional [Cl ][ief ][Judge, City Small Causes ][Court' ][Hyderabad']
2. One CC to [Sri ][Da ][nodar ][Mundra, Advocate ][IOPUC]]
3. One CC [to Sri ][R. ][\. ][Achuthanand, Advocate ][IOPUCI]
4. Two CD CoPies
5. One SPare [CoPY]gbr&
HIGH COURT
DATED: 311121i021
ORDERCRP.No.1 of 2( 16
DISMISSING THE CRPAS INFRUCTU OUS
)I
1IIt-Jt)I7 til [2il22]