Telangana High Court
WP/38952/2014 of Sri.D.Sankar Vs The State of A.P. on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.38736, 38892, 38908, 38952, 38980, 38981, 39136, 40442, 40464, 40472, 40492, 40506 & 40534 of 2014 Dated: 30.12.2014 W.P.No.38736 of 2014 Between: Smt. S.T.Kavitha .. Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos.38736, 38892, 38908, 38952, 38980, 38981,39136, 40442, 40464, 40472, 40492, 40506 &40534 of 2014
Dated: 30.12.2014
W.P.No.38736 of 2014Between:Smt. S.T.Kavitha .. Petitioner andThe State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by itsPrincipal Secretary, Department of Civil Supplies,A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabadand others. .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Ch. Siva Reddy Counsel for the respondents : AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
All these writ petitions have been filed by the dealers of fairprice shops of various villages falling within the jurisdiction ofrespondent No.3, feeling aggrieved by the action of the saidrespondent in accepting their resignations.
On noticing that resignations were sent by fair price shopdealers on a mass scale, this Court has ordered personal appearanceof respondent No.3. Accordingly, respondent No.3 is personallypresent. He has placed before the Court individual proceedings, in allthese cases, issued on 26.12.2014, whereunder he has withdrawn hisearlier orders of accepting the petitioners’ resignations and restoredtheir authorisations. He has also directed the Tahsildars concerned toallot essential commodities to the petitioners from the month ofJanuary, 2015 onwards. Respondent No.3 has also expressed hisremorse for accepting the resignations without notice to the petitioners.
In view of the corrective steps taken by respondent No.3, thegrievance of the petitioners stood redressed and the writ petitions are,accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
As a sequel to disposal of these writ petitions,W.P.M.P.Nos.48513, 48724, 48725, 48741, 48742, 48805, 48806,48835, 48836, 48837, 48838, 49085, 49086, 50716, 50738, 50746,50782, 50799 & 50828 of 2014, filed by the petitioners for interim reliefin the respective writ petitions shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
_____________________
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
v v