Telangana High Court
WRIT PETITION 4112 of 2006 on 30 December 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD
MAIN CASE NO: W.P.No.4112 of 2006
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL.DATE ORDER OFFICE NONOTE record that the related writ petition was posted for hearing on 16.02.2017. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the case was deferred to 20.02.2017. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, on 20.02.2017, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
The application for restoration has been filed after 2097 days, which would be about six years. Reason given for such delay is that petitioner was under the impression that the matter was pending adjudication. After coming to know about the dismissal, the related restoration petition has been filed. Paragraph 6 of I.A.No.1 of 2022 reads as follows:
“6. It is respectfully submitted that we were under the impression that the matter is pending adjudication. However on learning about the dismissal, immediately the present restoration petition has been filed. As the cess paid is subject to the final outcome of the writ petition, it is imperative that the matter be decided on merits. If not the petitioner will suffer severe hardship.