Telangana High Court
WP/10222/2002 of Lingamaneni Esates ( p ) Ltd., Vijayawada, Vs The Govt. of A.P., on 29 December 2009
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.10222 OF 2002 Dated 29th December, 2009 Between: Lingamaneni Estates (P) Ltd, Vijayawada …Petitioner And The Government of Anhdra Pradesh rep. By Its Principal Secretary to Government and another … Respondents Counsel for the
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.10222 OF 2002
Dated 29thDecember, 2009
Between:
Lingamaneni Estates (P) Ltd, Vijayawada …Petitioner
And
The Government of Anhdra Pradesh rep. ByIts Principal Secretary to Government and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.Srinivasula Reddy for Sri V.R.Avula Counsel for respondents : --- The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleasedto issue writ or direction particularly in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus or any other appropriate orderdeclaring the amendment to Registration Act, 1908by way of Section 32(A), issued by the firstrespondent, pursuant to the amendment issued bythe Government of India to the Registration Act,1908, the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and theIndian Stamp Act, 1899 (Central Act 48 of 2001), sofar making it compulsory the presence of purchasersand their GPAs at the time of registration ofimmovable property, as illegal, void and arbitrary.”
At the hearing, Sri K.Srinivasula Reddy, learned counselrepresenting Sri V.R.Avula, learned counsel for the petitioner,submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive forconsideration.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Dated 29[th] December, 2009vrn
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J