Telangana High Court
CC/926/2017 of SALLA SUDHIR REDDY, RANGA REDDY DIST Vs SMT. ESTHER ANITHA, RANGA REDDY DIST on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO i 926 0F 2017 Cbntempt case filed under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the
IN THE HIGH COURT [FOR ]THE STATE [OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY [NINTH DAY ][OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND [TWENTY THREE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ]JUSTICE [J ][SREENIVAS ][RAO]
CONTEMPT CASE [NO]i [926 ]0F [2017]
Cbntempt case filed under Sections [10 ][lo ][12 ][of ][Contempt ][of ][Courts ][Act]1971 to [punish ]the respondent [herein ][for ][willful, ][intentional ][and ][deliberate]violation of the orders daled [14-12'2016 passed ][in W.P. No. ][43204 ][of ][2016 ][of]this Honble High Court.
Between:
SALLA SUDHIR REDDY, [S/o ][Veera ][Reddy, ][Aged ][aboul 42 years, ][Occ. Agriculture,]R/o. 12-19, Uppal, [Medchal District.]
...PETITIONER
AND
SMT. ESTHER [ANITHA, The ][Tahsildar, ][Uppal Mandal, Medchal District.]
, ..RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. [T ][RATAN ][SINGH, ][Advocate(NOT ][PRESENT)]Counsel for the Respondents: [ASSISTANT ][GP ][FOR REVENUE (TG)]
The Court made the following: [ORDER]
Iii;
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAOCONTEMPT CASE No.926 of 2Ol7
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The contempt case is filed seeking to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of CourtsAct, 197 l, for deliberate and willful disobedience inimplementing the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.43204of 2016, dated 14.12.2O16
2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner in themorning and aJternoon sessions. Heard learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf ofrespondent.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader basing on theinstructions submits that pursuant to rhe order passed by thisCourt dated 74.12.2016 in W.P.No.432O4 of 2016, therespondent-authorities considered the clarm of the petitionerand issued proceedings. No.Bl322/20 17, dated 15.05.2017. Acopy of the said proceedings is placed before this Court.
4In view of the compliance [of ][the order ][dated ][14' ][l2'2Q16']
no further adjudication [is required.]
5Accordingly, the [Contempt ][Case ][is ][closed.]
Pending miscellaneous [applications, ][if ][any, ][shall ][stand]
closed.
SD/-K. SAILESHI/DEPUW REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
FFICER
SECTIO
To,I.TwoCCstoGPFORREVENUE(TG),HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganatourl2. bne CC [to SRl. T.RATAN SINGH Advocate IOPUC]]3. Two CD [coPies.]cvkMY,$$.
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
CC.No.926 of [2017]
CC IS CLOSED.
1tE5tr(.oA.ooIiIAR7fr14'15**I6PAf0eolr$i'-QS "
t
-FE+.