Telangana High Court

WP/23777/2006 of Gururanadam Tirupathamma, Vs The Station House Officer, Buchireddypalem Police on 26 December 2006

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTYSIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUNSAND AND SIX THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA And THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23777 OF 2006 Between: Gururanadam Tirupathamma Petitioner AND The

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OFANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTYSIXTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUNSAND AND SIX

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMAAnd

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO. 23777 OF 2006

Between:

Gururanadam Tirupathamma

Petitioner

AND

The Station House Officer,Buchireddypalem Police Station,Nellore District and another Respondents ORAL ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Swaroop Reddy)

This writ petition is taken up based on a telegramdated 10.11.2006 addressed by the petitioner to theHon’ble the Chief Justice, alleging that one GurunadamAudiseshaiah was illegally detained by the Police,Buchireddypalem, Nellore District and he apprehendsdanger to his life.

In response to the notices issued by this court, theSub-Inspector of Police, Buhireddypalem Police Stationfiled counter affidavit stating that Mr. Shodam Mohan,resident of Kotha Minagallu village lodged complaintstating that on the intervening night of 25/26.10.2006, histhirty sheep were stolen from the cattle shed. On the basisof this complaint, a case in Cr. No. 154 of 2006 for theoffence under Sec.379 IPC was registered and during thecourse of investigation, he arrested five persons and alsorecovered the stolen sheep. It is further stated that thearrested persons have confessed that the alleged missingperson by name Gurunadam Audiseshaiah was also oneamong the culprits. It is further stated that the allegeddetenue, who is also an accused in the said case, is atlarge and efforts are being made to arrest him and anotheraccused. The Sub-Inspector of police also filed relevantrecord. Thus it is revealed that the alleged detenue hasabsconded whereas the other five accused involved in the case were arrested and remanded.

In view of these revelations, we do not find anyreason to disbelieve the version of the police.Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. No order asto cost.

______________

D.S.R. Varma, J.

December 26, 2006MAS.

________________

P.Swaroop Reddy, J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead