Telangana High Court
CRP/1444/2014 of T.BALACHANDRA REDDY Vs J.SRINIVASA RAO AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 14,14 OF 2014 Petition filed Under Section 115 of CPC aggrieved by the Order dated:28-3-2o'14 on
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF [TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 14,14 OF 2014
Petition filed Under Section 115 of CPC aggrieved by the [Order ][dated:28-3-2o'14]on E.P.No.2'112012 in O.S.No.390/2005 on the file of the Learned [Principal Junior]Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District.
Between:
T.Balachandra Reddy, S/o Ramachandra Reddy, Aged:47 Wa:..s, Occ: SanskritTeacher, APR School, (Girls) Coutuppal, Nalgonda Dist. Presently working atAPR School (Boys) NRR Puram, Site-lll, Borabanda, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner/Judgment Debtor
AND
1. J.srinivasa Rao, S/o Ramulu, Aged 35 [years, ]Occ: Business, R/o [Enkoor]Village and Mandal, Khammam District.Village and Mandal, Khammam District.
...RespondenUDecree Holder
2. The Principal, AP Residential School [(Boys), ]NRR [Puram, ][Site-lll, ][Borabanda,]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
...RespondenUGarnishee
CMP. NO: 2019 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the [circumstances ][stated]in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be [pleased ][To ][suspend ][the]operation of the order [passed ]in E.P.No.2112012 in [O.S.No.390/2005 ][dt:]2Bt3t2O14 on the file of learned Principal [Junior ][Civil ][Judge, ][Kothagudem,]Khammam Dist., pending disposal of the main CRP [in ][the ][interest ][of ][justice.]
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KOWTURU [VINAYA KUMAR]
Counsel forthe Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'B[E SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHW,ITTA REDDYCIVIL I]EVISION PETITION NO. 1444 OF iiI,OI4
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard lt arned counsel for the revision pctitior r:r. Perusedthe case statL s information in E.P.No.2l of 2012 [c ]n the file oflearned Princi ;al Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem v'herein, it isshown that on 22.02.2019 the Execution Petition [r.r,e ]s dismissedfor default.
2. There bre, since no cause survives in this CL.ril RevisionPetition, it is d.smissed as infructuous. In the circu r:,;tar-rces ofthe case, there shall be no order as to the costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if any pending; shall stands closed.
SdIT.SRINIVASDE,['UTY REGISTRAR( 1I)SEGTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The Principal J.rnior [Civil ][Judge, Kothagudem, ][Khammart ][Distt'ict']2. One CC to SRl. [KOWTURU VINAYA ][KUMAR, ][Advocakr ][['fPUC]]3. Two CD CoPie;.KAMplp{
t
I
III
HIGH COUR T
DATED:301'1212022
rirffi\\87.TEB7f[]ar'J] ).,I.i.,: i .-:r I l.r-*\:
ORDER
CRP.No.144,l of 2014
THIS CNIL RE\ ISTON PETITION [TS ]DISMISSED 4I; [INFRUCTUOUS.]D?^\"\ t \,