Telangana High Court
WP/29113/2019 of Smt. Chodam Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.29113 OF 2019 DATED : 31.12.2019 Between : Smt Chodam Lalitha W/o.Late Bhoomaiah, Aged about 59 yrs, Occu : Household, R/o.Plot No.2, Shadnagar, Petbasherabad, Near Reliance Petrol Pump, Jeedimetla, Qutbullapur Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29113 OF 2019
DATED : 31.12.2019
Between :
Smt Chodam Lalitha W/o.Late Bhoomaiah, Aged about 59 yrs, Occu : Household, R/o.Plot No.2, Shadnagar, Petbasherabad, Near Reliance Petrol Pump, Jeedimetla, Qutbullapur Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.
..... Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep., by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.29113 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents.
2. According to petitioner, her father was the owner of land to an extent of Ac.0-23 guntas in Sy.No.323/EE of Ananthasagar Village, Chegunta Mandal, Medak District. Petitioner claims to have succeeded to the said property. It is not stated as to why petitioner kept quiet even though her father expired on 20.07.2002, but made representation only on 29.10.2019 and alleging inaction on the said representation, this writ petition is filed.
3. It is apparent from the material on record that no application for mutation was filed, but a representation was made which is not valid. According to the procedure evolved by the Government, any person who seeks mutation of her/his name in the revenue records, has to submit application in Form VI-A through online web portal and only on making such application, the request for mutation is processed. Apparently, petitioner has not made such application. Therefore, the direction sought by the petitioner cannot be granted.
4. Thus, leaving it open to the petitioner to make application, in accordance with the procedure envisaged, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
31[st] December, 2019 Rds Rds
__________________
P.NAVEEN RAO,J