Telangana High Court
WA/2064/2004 of P. Satyanarayana, Vs the Secretary and Correspondent, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2064 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
&
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2064 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated13/08/2004 in WP NO : 6088 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
P. Satyanarayana, S/o. Venkatachalam,
R/o. Paidipally, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District.
..... APPELLANT
AND
1 the Secretary and Correspondent, Dr. V. Malleshwar MemorialSaraswathi, Aided High School, Kareemabad, Warangal.
2 The District Educational Officer, Warangal.
3 The Regional Joint Direcator of School Education, Warangal.
4 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, A.P., Hyd.
5 Government of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyd.
6 K. Sridevi, D/o. Lasminarasimha Chary, Saraswathi Aided High School, Kareemabad, Warangal.
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant:MR.D.LINGA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents.: MR.S.LAXMA REDDY
G.P. for School Education.
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT :(Per the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari)
This writ appeal is filed by the writ petitioner-appellant herein aggrieved bythe order in W.P. No: 6088 of 2004, under which the learned single Judge dismissedthe said writ petition.
The appellant herein is the writ petitioner. The learned single Judge havingobserved that, the petitioner has not questioned with regard to the process ofselection and the competence of the sixth respondent, dismissed the writ petition.Having aggrieved by the same, the present writ appeal is preferred by the appellant-writ petitioner.
Heard the learned counsel.
We have perused the order impugned and the entire material available onrecord. It is observed by the learned single Judge that admittedly, the sixthrespondent stood first in the selection process and secured more number of marksand therefore, she was selected. It is further observed by the learned single Judgethat the petitioner has not questioned with regard to the process of selection and thecompetence of the sixth respondent.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner has contendedthat the writ petitioner has possessed the requisite qualification whereas the sixthrespondent did not possess the requisite qualification. It is further contended that atthe time of interview, the subject expert in wood work has alone attended theinterview as Expert Member but no expert in tailoring had attended the interview andtherefore, the selection and appointment of the 6[th] respondent is untenable.
As rightly observed by the learned single Judge, the writ petitioner has notquestioned the process of selection and the competence of the sixth respondent.Therefore, we are not inclined to agree with the contentions raised by the learnedcounsel for the writ petitioner. We do not find any illegality or irregularity in the orderpassed by the learned single Judge and as such, it does not warrant anyinterference by this Court.
In the result, the Writ Appeal is dismissed confirming the order of the learned __________________
Justice T.Meena Kumari
Date : 30[th] December, 2004
__________________
Justice S. Ananda Reddy
Dvs/Gurc.
Copies to the
1 the Secretary and Correspondent, Dr. V. Malleshwar MemorialSaraswathi, Aided High School, Kareemabad, Warangal. Saraswathi, Aided High School, Kareemabad, Warangal.
2 The District Educational Officer, Warangal.
3 The Regional Joint Direcator of School Education, Warangal.
4 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, A.P., Hyd.
5 Government of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat,Hyd.
6 K.Sridevi,D/o.LasminarasimhaChary,
Saraswathi Aided High School, Kareemabad, Warangal.
Conclusion
7. G.P. for School Education, High Ciourt Buildings, High Court of A.P. Hyd.
(OUT)
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI
&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
W.A.No.2064 of 2004
(Judgment delivered bySmt.Justice T.Meena Kumari)
30[th] December, 2004