Telangana High Court
CRP/4661/2014 of S.Durga Prasad Vs K.Padmnabham on 31 December 2020
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CIVIL REVIS ION PETITIO N NO: 4661 OF 2014 PetitionunderArticle22TofConstitutionoflndia,aggrievedbytheorderdated 18tO7l2o14in lA No.212 0f
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, [THE THIRTY FIRST ][DAY ][OF ][DECEIVBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND TWENTY]
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE ][G ][SRI ][DEVI]
CIVIL REVIS[ION ][PETITIO][ N NO: 4661 ][OF ][2014]
PetitionunderArticle22TofConstitutionoflndia,aggrievedbytheorderdated18tO7l2o14in lA [No.212 ][0f ][2014 ][in ][oS ][No.B77 ][0f ][2013 ][0n the file of ][the court ][of ][the]XXV Additional Chief [Judge, City ][Civil ][Court, Hyderabad']
Between:
s Duroa Prasad. s/o s.Janardhan [Age.49 years, ][occ: ][Hotel Business, ][[vl/s ][Bhavani]6"'iirilu.'. n.t [jo:-s-ioaor+, ][at ][Kachisuda ][Xtoad. ]EX?;f3;3*rENr/ DEFENDANT
AND
l.K.Padmnabham,S/olateK.V'Pandharinath,Age:58years,occ:PrivateService,R/o H.No. 4-2-1035, [Ramkote, Hyderabad']R/o H.No. 4-2-1035, [Ramkote, Hyderabad']
z. X.Raieshwari, Wlo [raie ][k.iirihatir, ][nge:+g years, Occ: ][House ][wife' ][R/o ][H ][No ][4-]2-1 035, Ramkote, 035, Ramkote, [Hyderabad.]2-1 035, Ramkote, 035, Ramkote, [Hyderabad.]
2-1 035, Ramkote, 035, Ramkote, s - k. nio Rr"irdi;nig,, H No:-5-1030/4, [sl,j ][iate ]Kachiguda [K ][V ][Pandharinath, Age:50 years' ]X Road, Hyderabad[occ: ][Business']
H No:-5-1030/4, No:-5-1030/4, 4 K S;.b;;rr, [olo ][late ][K.VlPandharinath, Age:58 vears' ][occ: ][Teacher']nlo'H No [g-S-1030/4, ][Kachiguda ][X ][Road, Hyderabad']nlo'H No [g-S-1030/4, ][Kachiguda ][X ][Road, Hyderabad']
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS
CRPMP. NO: 6380 [0F ][2014]
Page 1 of 2
Petition under section [151 ][of ][cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High ][court ][may be pleased ][to ][stay ][the operations of]order in tA No.2'12 [ol ][zo14 ][in ][oS ilo.877 ][ol ][2013 ][on the file ][of ][XXV Additional ][Chief]Judge, City Civil [Court, at Hyderabad and pass ][such ][other order or orders']
For the Petitioner [: ][SRI ][P.GlRl ][KRISHNA, ][Advocate]
FortheReSpondentNos.lto4:SRIBETHIVENKATESWARLU'Advocate The Court made the [following: ORDER]
ORDER:
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CIVIT- ttEV]SI()N PETII'ION N().-166 I ()1.- 201+
Learned counsel h.rr thc petitioner u,or_rlcl subntit that llt(.iIrsc ]n tlris ri'r'isior-r cl.r's noI srrr-r'i''r,]irrtlrrr iLrijLrrlicati,n .Lncl tlr,,.iIrsc ]n tlris ri'r'isior-r cl.r's noI srrr-r'i''r,]irrtlrrr iLrijLrrlicati,n .Lncl tlr,,rcr.ision has be come infructuous In that I'ieu of the matter, recorcling the said submission. thc,Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as inl'ructuons. There shalr bcno order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if anv, pending shall stancl d ismissed.
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212020
ORDERCRP.No.4661 of 2014
1EL.6.\,/$*rl-ctie,s"-o{p"C),f(3 li,l
Dismissing the CRP as infructuous without costs.
(a')V....\2'r\. {rX
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…