Telangana High Court
WP/29371/2009 of Sri Adi Subbaramaiah , Ramananda Swamulawaru, Vs The District Collector, on 31 December 2009
MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.29371 of 2009 ORDER: According to the petitioner-Trust, the landed property of an extent of Ac.5-15 cents in Sy.No.238 of Tottambedu Sub-District, Srikalahasthi Mandal, Ammapalem Group, Chukkalanidigallu Revenue Village, Chittoor District, was owned and possessed
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
ORDER:
According to the petitioner-Trust, the landed property of an extent ofAc.5-15 cents in Sy.No.238 of Tottambedu Sub-District, SrikalahasthiMandal, Ammapalem Group, Chukkalanidigallu Revenue Village, ChittoorDistrict, was owned and possessed by Sri Nityanandagiri Swamy @Nityananda Swamy since 1941 and after his death, the names of the trusteesof the Ashram and successors-in-interest were mutated in the revenuerecords and since then, it has been in possession and enjoyment of the saidproperty. While the matter stood thus, it appears, the 3[rd] respondent-Tahsildar, Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District, issued proceedingsL.Dis.No.110/2009, dated 14-03-2009, mutating the names of respondents 4to 8 herein in respect of the subject land, without issuing any notice andwithout following the procedure as contemplated under Section 4 of the A.P.Rights in Land Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, and the rules made thereunder. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has filed an appeal along with stayapplication before the 2[nd] respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi,on 28-03-2009 and the same are pending. The grievance of the petitioner isthat neither the appeal is taken up for consideration nor the stay application isdisposed of.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing anyopinion on merits, the 2[nd] respondent is directed to dispose of the appealpurported to have been filed by the petitioner on 28-03-2009 against the orderof the 3[rd] respondent, dated 14-03-2009, and pass appropriate orders as perlaw, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder. Till such time, the respondents are directed to maintain status quoobtaining as on today as to the entries in the revenue records.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order asto costs.
__________