Telangana High Court
WP/33319/2013 of Mohd. Akram All Khan Vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.33319 of 2013 ORDER: The learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition secured detailed instructions, in writing and based thereon the learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the road development plan has been approved in file
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAOWRIT PETITION No.33319 of 2013
ORDER:
The learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition secureddetailed instructions, in writing and based thereon the learnedAssistant Government Pleader would submit that the roaddevelopment plan has been approved in file No.97/MCH/TPS/RW/2006 proposing 150 feet wide road towards the western side ofthe petitioner’s property from Erragadda to Panjagutta.
It is considered that the property of the petitioner is likely to beimpacted to an extent of 168.08 square yards excluding the existing 30feet road towards southern side of his property. Most significantly it isstated that the respondents 1 to 3 will acquire the petitioner’s propertyfollowing the due process of law, keeping in view the provisionscontained under Section 146 and 147 of the Hyderabad MunicipalCorporation Act, 1956 and then proceed further in the matter, but nototherwise.
In this view of the statement made by the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Land Acquisition, the cause of the writ petitiondoes not survive. Liberty is always preserved to the petitioner toagitate all such questions at any further point of time, if the necessityfor doing so arises.
Copy of the instructions received by the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Land Acquisition has been placed on the fileof this case and it is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writpetition, if any, shall stand closed.
30[th] December, 2013BV
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J