Telangana High Court
WP/28318/2008 of SRI. GUNTI , MANGALI RAMA KISTAIAH, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 28318 of 2008 Between: SRI. GUNTI @ MANGALI RAMA KISTAIAH, S/o. Gunti @ Mangali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKARWRIT PETITION NO : 28318 of 2008
Between:
SRI. GUNTI @ MANGALI RAMA KISTAIAH, S/o. Gunti @ MangaliYellaiah, R/o. H.No.1-53, Neknampur Village, Rajendernagar Mandal,Ranga Reddy District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The District Revenue Officer, Hyderabad District, Having its Office at: Hyderabad.
3 The Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Hyderabad District, having its office at Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriatewrit or writs, order or orders declaring the INACTION of the respondentNo.1 in not disposing the appeal with Appeal No.9733/SS-1 of 2008which was filed by me against the Memo dated 28-01-2008 inLr.No.A3/338/2004 issued by the 3rd respondent as it being illegal andarbitrary and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to dispose theappeal with No.9733/SS-1 of 2008-1 pending on the file of the 1strespondent according to law by fixing the date of hearing and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. RESU MAHENDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKARWrit Petition No. 28318 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Pleader for Revenue.
The only grievance of the petitioner is that against the orders of theDeputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Hyderabad, dated28.01.2008, in Lr.No.A3/338/2004, he preferred an appeal before thefirst respondent, under Section 158 of the A.P. (Telangana Area) LandRevenue Act, 1317-F. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends thatthough the said appeal was filed on 18.02.2008, but so far neither theappeal nor the interlocutory application therein is considered by the firstrespondent. Questioning the inaction, the present writ petition is filed.
In view of the limited grievance as above, I deem it appropriate todispose of the writ petition with a direction to the first respondent toconsider and decide the aforesaid appeal or interlocutory petition thereinbearing No.9733/SS-1/2008-1, filed by the petitioner on 18.02.2008,expeditiously, but, in any case, within a period of two months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
_________________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J.
Nsr