Telangana High Court
WP/20122/1999 of M/S. Saradhi Garden Bar AND Restaurant, Vs The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20122 of 1999 Between: M/s. Sardhi Garden Bar & Restaurant,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20122 of 1999
Between:
M/s. Sardhi Garden Bar & Restaurant,Governorpet, Vijayawada.
… Petitioner
AND
The Government of A.P., rep., by itsSecretary, Labour Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P. Anantha Nageswara Rao for Sri Y. Rama Rao This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20122 of 1999
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorari to quashorder dated 15.05.1996 in APSE case No.65 of 1995 by whichrespondent No.2 directed the petitioner to pay a sum ofRs.36,392/- towards service compensation.
At the hearing, Sri P. Ananth Nageshwar Rao, learnedcounsel for the petitioner submitted that though stay was grantedinitially on 22.09.1999, the same was vacated on 20.10.2000 and awrit appeal filed against the said order was also dismissed. Thelearned counsel, however, is unable to say whether the impugnedorder has been implemented or not.
In view of the vacation of the interim stay, it is reasonableto presume that warrant issued by the V Metropolitan Magistrate,Vijayawada in Form No.44 on 14.05.1999 for execution of theimpugned order would have been executed.
The writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous.
____________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J