Telangana High Court
WP/28261/2008 of S.Vishwanadha Reddy Vs Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society on 30 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 28261 of 2008 Between: S.Vishwanadha Reddy S/o.S.Obul Reddy R/o.Sullurpeta D.O.S. Colony,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWRIT PETITION NO : 28261 of 2008
Between:
S.Vishwanadha Reddy S/o.S.Obul Reddy
R/o.Sullurpeta D.O.S. Colony, Nellore District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Kurukonda, Rep. by itsPresident, Paravari Satram (M), Nellore District. President, Paravari Satram (M), Nellore District.
2 General Manager, District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., Nellore.
3 District Co-operative Officer, Aravindnagar, Nellore.
4 Divisional Co-operative Officer, Near S.R.A. Talkies, Gudur, NelloreDistrict.District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of therespondents in not disposing of the petitioner's representation dated11.06.2008, as illegal, improper and against A.P. Co-Operative SocietiesAct, 1964 apart from being violative of Article 14 of Constitution of Indiaand consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of thepetitioner for release of salary for the period 01.04.03 to 30.03.2005 as perhis eligibility.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VIVEKANANDA RAMINENI
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:-
The petitioner’s case is that he was appointed as Secretary,Tallapadu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society on 30.10.1980, andsubsequently he was transferred to Peddapariya, but during his tenure atPeddapariya Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, he was not paidsalary for the period 1.4.2003 to 30.3.2005. Then, he made arepresentation dated 11.6.2008 to the respondents for payment of hissalary for the aforementioned period. Now, the petitioner’s grievance isthat the respondents have neither considered his representation nor paidthe salary due to him.
Inasmuch as the representation of the petitioner is pendingconsideration before the respondents, both the learned counsel for thepetitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents agreed to thedisposal of the writ petition with the following directions:
“The respondents are directed to consider the representation dated11.2.2008 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate ordersthereon in accordance with law expeditiously.”
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs.
_____________
N.V.RAMANA, J
30[th] December, 2008
bcj