Telangana High Court
WP/31085/2011 of Akberuddin Owaisi, Vs A.P. State Wakf Board, on 29 December 2011
SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.NO.31085 of 2011 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by Akberuddin Owaisi seeking Mandamus declaring the inaction of the first respondent in considering the representation complaining illegal constructions on property of Masjid-e-Quboor, situated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed by Akberuddin Owaisiseeking Mandamus declaring the inaction of the first respondent inconsidering the representation complaining illegal constructions onproperty of Masjid-e-Quboor, situated at Panjagutta, Ameerpet,Hyderabad as illegal and arbitrary.
The petitioner claims to be a member of the LegislativeAssembly. The Wakf institution known as Masjid-e-Quboor issituated at Panjagutta, Ameerpet, Hyderabad and it is a registeredWakf. The Commissioner of Wakf appointed by the StateGovernment has also surveyed the institution and declared thatthe institution is in an extent of 8162 square yards. According tothe petitioner, some un-social elements encroached upon certainportion of the land to an extent of 1800 square yards and they arecarrying on construction. He submitted a representation to theA.P. State Wakf Board-first respondent on 15-11-2011 to preventthe illegal construction. There being no action on the part of thefirst respondent, he approached this Court invoking the jurisdictionunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the reliefstated supra.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondentand the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2to 4.
The limited grievance of the petitioner is non-consideration of his representation dated 15-11-2011whereunder he complained illegal constructions that are being carried on the property owned by Masjid-e-Quboor.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the first respondent to consider the representation of thepetitioner dated 15-11-2011 and take appropriate action afterputting on notice to the affected parties. No costs.
rkkDated: 29-12-2011
___________________________
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J