Telangana High Court
CRLP/15227/2013 of Rathlavath Venkati Vs The State of A.P., on 30 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN : PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R.KANTHA RAO CRLP .NO:15227 of 2013 Between: 1 Rathlavath Venkati, S/o. Somla, 2 Smt. V. Lakshmi, W/o. Srinu, ..... Petitioners/Accused 6 &
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN: PRESENT:THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R.KANTHA RAOCRLP .NO:15227 of 2013
Between:
1Rathlavath Venkati, S/o. Somla,
2Smt. V. Lakshmi, W/o. Srinu,
AND
..... Petitioners/Accused 6 & 7
The State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., through SHO, Meerpet PS., Cyberabad.
.....Respondent/Complainant
Petition under section 438 of Cr.PC., praying that in thecircumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Courtmay be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/ accused Nos. 6and 7 in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime vide FIR No. 621of 2013 on the file of the Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station,Cyberabad..
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing thePetition and the memo of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing thearguments of Smt. N. Malathi Naidu, Advocate for the Petitioners, and ofthe Addl. Public Prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“The Petitioners-A6 and A7 apprehend arrest in Cr. No. 621 of 2013 ofMeerpet Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offencespunishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 read with 34 IPC. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State.
A1, who is the prime accused in this case, and who allegedlyimpersonated the father of the de facto complainant, was grantedanticipatory bail. Thus, the petitioners, who are said to be purchasersfrom A1, in my view, can also be granted anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioners-accused are directed to surrender themselves before the StationHouse Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Cyberabad within 20 days fromtoday. On such surrender, they shall be released on bail on each ofthem executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees tenthousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to thesatisfaction of the same Station House Officer”.
To
//TRUE COPY//
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1. The Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Cyberabad..
2. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)(OUT)
3. One CC to Smt N. Malathi Naidu, bAdvocate (OPUC)
4. One spare copy
Skm
Drafted by: skmDrafted on: 30-12-2013
HIGH COURT
RKR,J
DATE: 30-12-2013
BAIL ORDER
CRL.P. NO. 15227 of 2013