Telangana High Court
WP/25245/2004 of Shaik Bade Peera, Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer, on 31 December 2004
SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.25245 of 2014 ORDER Both the petitioners are present in the Court today. The Advocate, who appeared on their behalf before the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kurnool, was also present in the Court. All of them have
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25245 of 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Both the petitioners are present in the Court today. TheAdvocate, who appeared on their behalf before the learned SpecialJudicial Magistrate of First Class, Kurnool, was also present in theCourt. All of them have regretted the actions which they havedone so far.
2. The petitioners seek permission of the Court to withdrawthis writ petition. They also assure that they will not conduct inany manner, which is likely to cause the slightest apprehension inthe mind of any Court where any lis relating to them is listed.
3. The Writ Petition stands dismissed accordingly. No costs.The notice issued on 01.09.2014 shall stand discharged.Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shallstand dismissed.
___________________________
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J
9[th] September,2014
sj