Telangana High Court
WP/24067/2020 of Kathula Muthamma Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2020
W/o Late Ramesh' aqgd, about 55 occ. Housewife, R/o Nampaity iTif-f'g" 'nO Mandal' Nalgonda District' yea rs, ...PETITIONER 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by i!:,Prlnclqll-^S.:::letarv Home DeDartment, selieiafiat 6uilding, secretariat. Hyderabad. , r#'5r;;;iir"i"'"t
WEDNESDAY ,THE [THIRTIETH ][DAY ][OF DECEMBER]
TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRIJUSTICE ][P. NAVEEN ][RAO]
WRIT PETITION [NO: 24067 OF ][2020]
Between:
yea rs,Kathula [lvluthamma, ][W/o ][Late ][Ramesh' aqgd, ][about ][55]Mandal' [Nalgonda District']occ. Housewife, [R/o Nampaity ][iTif-f'g" ]'nO
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State [of ][Telangana, ][Rep ][by ][i!:,Prlnclqll-^S.:::letarv]Home DeDartment, [selieiafiat ][6uilding, ][secretariat. ][Hyderabad.], r#'5r;;;iir"i"'"t "t [ioit-e' ][Natgonoi' ][Nalsond-a ][District']3. The Deputy [SuperintenOlni"ot ][pofi&' ][Devaraikonda Nalqonda ][District]4. The Circle [lnspector ]"t'F"rit"' [r'rimpi ][v ][Circle' ][Nampally' ][Nalgonda]u ?i'J's[,, a Gadeoaka Shankar, " ", ", [: ][e ][_oI)3"[* ][S][e ]#fi [] ][[5$.,"b31? ][i%",;],?!1 ]["6 ][:3 ][B',;lii':,.]" HL"Nli irilv Viirig'" ano trrtandat' Nalsonda. [District']7 ' Gadepaka [saou ][nao, ][tl:'r";i'ithlnl;a.ao^o.u1 ][98 ][vears' ][occ ][Business']ilo*r.f!rpuf ly Village and Mandal' Nalgbnda District'u essB G ;;;;k:, [yt ][ri" ][lni ][srll'io ][nilfl: ]R/o NamPallY [Village ][i]tg",Sfl ::,S,l?,f, [", ][occ ]I ;in g Gadeoaka shankar, siii bijrili"ii, [Ag6o auout +z years, occ. ][Labours,]" Hf'N;;;rllv ViirJg'" l"d-rua ndal' [Na-lsonda ][District']lo.cadepaka " [Praveen, ][sjli ][b"'ili"ii' ]vanoat Nalgonda District'[Ag6d about ][42 ][years' ][occ ][Labours']Hto*fll"lp"f ry Village ana 1'1 ' .Gadepaka [rr,,laorru. ][sl3'r-lr<s['iiillr'' ][A6"o ][about.22 vears' ][occ ][Business']ilf-N!rparlv Village ind ttr'landal' Nalgonda,District12. '' cadepaka [vamshi. ][sf ][i;k$;;i;rr' ][dgld ][aoout J3 ][vears ][occ ][Business']ilb N;;;ritv vittage ind tr'4andal' Nalgonda District'l3 Gadeoaka [Manoj. ][slJiJr<;ffi;;it' ][Ag""n ][about ][24 ][vears ][occ ][Business']and [10 ][others]R/o Nampallv [virrase';l"i;a;;; ]"N;l';"dtDstriit ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under [Article ][226 ][of ][the Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances [stated ][in ][the ][affidavit ][filed ][therewith' ][the ][High Court may ][be]pleased to issue [a ][Writ ][order ][or direction ][more ][particularly one ][in ][the ][nature ][of]Writ of [lr,4andamus ][declaring ][the ][action ][of ][respondent ][No ][5 ][in non-receiving the]complaint [of ][the ][petitioner against ][the ][respondent ][No ][6 ][to ][13' who ][illegally]trespassed [into ][the ][petitioners ][house ][dismantled ][the ][house ][of ][the ][petitioner]situated [at ][Nampally ][Village ][and ][Mandal' ][Nalgonda ][District ][is ][highly ][illegal']arbitrary, [u ][nconstitutional, ][uniust ][and ][in ][violation ][of ][Principles ][of ][Natural]Justice [and also ][in ][violation ][of ][Articles ][14' ]['1 ][I ][and ][21 ][and ][300-4 ][of ][the]constitution [of ][rndia ][and consequen y direct ][the ][5th ][respondent ][to ][receive the]complaint [of ][the ][petitioner ][and ][to ][register ][the ][FIR ][against ][the ][respondent]No.6 to [13.]
lA NO: [1 ]OF [2020]
Petition under [Section 151 CPC praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit [filed in ][support ][of the ][petition' ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to]direct the sth [respondent ][to ][receive ][the ][complaint ][of ][the ][petitioner ][and ][to]the [FIR against ][the ][respondent ][No ][6 ][to ][13 ][pending ][disposal ][of ][the]register writ petition.
Counsel for [the Petitioner ][: ][SRI RAPOLU ][BHASKAR]a;;;;i for [the Respondent ][Nos'1 ][to ][5: ][AGP ][FoR ][HoME]Counsel for [the Respondent ][Nos'6 ][to ][13:---]
The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO [/]WRIT PETITION NO.24067 oP 20/20 [/]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, and the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home lor respondents.Assistant Government Pleader for Home lor respondents.
2. This writ petition is filed alleging that even though cognizablecrime is reported, Police refused to register the crime.
3. According to the learned Assistant Governmenr Pleader, onreceiving the complaint, G.D. entry was made, preliminary enquirywas conducted and having found that complaint is in the nature ofcivil dispute, petitioner was accordingly informed, andacknowledged by the petitioner. Therefore, no complaint ispending with the Police.
4. Having regard to the fact that matter is already attended bythe respondent-Police, the prayer in the writ petition does notsurvive for consideration. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed,leaving it open to the petitioner to u'ork ou! her remedl, asavailable in law. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall standclosed.
SD/.L,LAKSHMI BABUASSISTANT REGIS//TRUE COPY//SECTIOFFICER
To,
1. One CC lo Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate [OPUC]
[OPUC]2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telanganaat Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
SMCl
HIGH COURTDATED:30/12l2020
ORDER.. tttWP.No.24067 of 2020f*1tlcs(zJoo0 [6 ][JAN ][2021]l_'*,Di: .q DISMISSING THE WPWITHOUT COSTS"l,r\.tP\:<>