Telangana High Court
WP/16761/2018 of K.Venkatanarayana, Vs The Chairman and Managing Director, on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION NO: 16761 OF 2018 Between: AND 1. 2. 3. K.Ventatanarayana, S/o Gopaiah E.C.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTIWRIT PETITION NO: 16761 OF 2018
Between:
K.Ventatanarayana, S/o Gopaiah E.C. No. 00440894, Aged about 59 years,Occ. General Mazdoor, Area lMain Workshop, R/o. SD-19, 24 Area, Yellandu,Bhadradri Kothagudem District
...pETrroNER
AND
1.The Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Company Limited,Singareni Bhavan, Read Hills, Hyderabad.Singareni Bhavan, Read Hills, Hyderabad.2.The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL),Kothagudem, Khammam District.Kothagudem, Khammam District.3.The General lvlanager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The SingareniCollieries Company Limited, Welfare Wing. Corporate Personnel Department,Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.Collieries Company Limited, Welfare Wing. Corporate Personnel Department,Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.
4The Chief Medical Officer, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited,Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...RESPoNDENTSKothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...RESPoNDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue to a writ, order or direction and more particularly one in thenature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the acts, deeds and things of theRespondents In not call for the Petitioner for Examination by the CorporateMedical Board to evaluate the Fitness of the Petitioner as per the Mines Act 1952and its Rules 1955 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural [justice]and consequently declare that Petitioner is unfit for the service of theRespondentnature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the acts, deeds and things of theRespondents In not call for the Petitioner for Examination by the CorporateMedical Board to evaluate the Fitness of the Petitioner as per the Mines Act 1952and its Rules 1955 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural [justice]and consequently declare that Petitioner is unfit for the service of theRespondent lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to conduct Medical Examination as per Mines Act1952 and its 1955 pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. MOHAN SAI BABA REPSRI CH. VENKAT RAMAN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P. SRI HARSHA REDDY,SC FOR SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL [KUMAR ][JUKANTI]
WRIT PETITION No.16761 [of2O18]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is submitted by Shri G.Mohan [Sai ][Baba, ][learned]
counsel representing Shrri Ch.Venkat [Raman, ][learned ][counsel]for the petitioner that due to efflr.x [of ][time, the ][cause ][in ][the]present writ petition does not survive and the [same ][has]become infructuous ln vierv ci tLrc sarLc, the V'/rit Petition [is ][dismissed ][as]
infructuous. There shall be no order [as ][to ][costs.]
if in [this ][Writ]l/iscellaneous applications pending, any, Petiti,;i-1, shatl stand clo,;ed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI
ASSISTANT RF€IxfuR
//TRUE COPY//
sEcrlo#dFFlcER
To,
1. One CC to [SRl. ][CH ][VENKAT RAMAN' ][f{vgqate ][IOPUCI]2. one CC to [SRl. SRI ][Hh?3ili ][iEtj6v': ][sc ][ioi ][SINGAHENI ][CoLLIERIES]-' cbllPnNv LlMlrEDloPUcl2. one CC to [SRl. SRI ][Hh?3ili ][iEtj6v': ][sc ][ioi ][SINGAHENI ][CoLLIERIES]-' cbllPnNv LlMlrEDloPUcl
3. Two PD Two PD PD BY [\)z-]
3. Two PD Two PD PD [CoPies]
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
WP.No.16761 of 2018
esTre oP202Io2 2 [J[Ii]oirlDESaA.I(,
Conclusion
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUSWITHOUT COSTS
@.8s*