Telangana High Court
WP/29208/2013 of Nelli Satya Narayana Vs Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.29208 of 2013 Date: 30.12.2013 Between : Nelli Satya Narayana .… Petitioner and Dr.Y.S.R. Horticultural University, rep. by its Registrar, Admn. Office, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari District. …. Respondent THE COURT MADE THE
Date: 30.12.2013
Between :
Nelli Satya Narayana
.… Petitioner
and
Dr.Y.S.R. Horticultural University, rep. by itsRegistrar, Admn. Office, Venkataramannagudem,West Godavari District.
…. Respondent
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Having regard to the short relief sought for by the petitionerto direct the respondent to pass appropriate orders on therepresentation dated 20.09.2013 submitted by the petitioner withina time frame, this writ petition is being disposed of at theadmission stage after hearing Sri B.Nagi Reddy, learned counselappearing for the petitioner as well as Sri C.Srinivasa Baba,learned Standing Counsel for respondent.
2. The petitioner states that he has been working as a CasualLabour in the Horticulture Research Station, Ambajipeta, WestGodavari District and has become eligible for being appointed asJunior Assistant-cum-Typist. He has put in 28 years of service. He submitted a representation dated 20.09.2013 to the respondentwith a request to regularize his services in the said post. Thegrievance of the petitioner is that though considerable time haselapsed, the respondent has not taken any action.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondentis not likely to consider the representation within a reasonabletime, in which event, the petitioner would suffer great hardship. The learned counsel, therefore, seeks a direction to the respondent to pass appropriate orders on the said representationwithin a time frame.
4. Sri C.Srinivasa Baba, learned Standing Counsel has noobjection to grant such a limited direction.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing therespondent to consider the representation dated 20.09.2013submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders inaccordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithin a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. No order as to costs.
6. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36280 of2013 is dismissed as unnecessary.
________________________
JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALIDate: 30.12.2013.TJMR
TJMR
WRIT PETITION No.29208 of 2013
Date: 30.12.2013