Telangana High Court
WP/38882/2013 of R.Vijaya Daniel S/o R. Ludhu Nathan, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.38882 of 2013 Date: 31.12.2013 Between : R.Vijaya Daniel .… Petitioner and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …. Respondents THE COURT
Date: 31.12.2013
Between :
R.Vijaya Daniel
.… Petitionerand
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by itsPrincipal Secretary, Higher Education Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
…. Respondents
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
In view of the short relief sought for by Sri G.Elisha, learnedcounsel appearing for the petitioner, to direct the second respondent –Commissioner and Director of College Education to dispose of therepresentation dated 12-08-2013 submitted by the petitioner, this WritPetition is disposed of at the admission stage after hearing both thelearned counsel.
2. The petitioner states that he has been appointed as a Lecturer inthe unaided vacancy in Andhra Christian College, Guntur by a dulyconstituted Selection Committee and he has put in more than 8 yearsservice. According to him, there is an aided vacancy and he is entitledto be absorbed into the same. He submitted representation dated 12-08-2013 with a request to the second respondent to absorb him intothe aided post. As no action has been taken on the same, thepetitioner has filed this Writ Petition. The petitioner submits that adirection be issued for the early disposal of the representation within atime frame.
3. Learned Government Pleader for High Education has noobjection to grant such a limited direction.
4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed ofdirecting the second respondent – Commissioner and Director ofCollege Education to consider the representation dated 12-08-2013submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders inaccordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
No costs.
5. In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.48325 of2013 stands closed.
________________________
JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
Date: 31.12.2013.TJMR
TJMR
WRIT PETITION No.38882 of 2013
Date: 31.12.2013