Telangana High Court
WA/2129/2004 of Harijana Labour Contract Co-op.Society Ltd., Vs The Executive Engineer, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2129 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,
CHIEF JUSTICE
and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2129 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated10/09/2004 in WP NO : 13402 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
Harijana Labour Contract Co-op.Society Ltd., H.No.750, UmmadivaramVillage, Vinukonda Mandal,Guntur Dist. rep.by its President V.P.Ranga Rao.
..... APPELLANT
AND
The Executive Engineer, Fisheries Department, Commissioner's office,Shantinagar, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : MR.KOONA REDDY ANJI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR FISHERIES
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT:
( per Hon’ble The Chief Justice )
……
1. Cancellation of tender by respondent is under challenge by the petitioner,who participated in the tender process. Mere participation in the tenderprocess does not give any right in favour of the petitioner – appellant toquestioning the action of the respondent in canceling the entire tender. Thereis no vested right in the petitioner nor any such right has been violated.Learned single Judge was justified in dismissing the writ petition.
2. Writ appeal fails and is dismissed. No costs.
_____________________
DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J.,
_____________________
M. NARAYANA REDDY. J.,
Dated: 30.12.2004.
VRK.
To
1. The Executive Engineer, Fisheries Department, Commissioner's office,Shantinagar, Hyderabad.Commissioner's office,Shantinagar, Hyderabad.
2. Two CCs to G.P., for Fisheries, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT).(OUT).
3. Two CD copies.
HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,
CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. NARAYANA REDDY.
W.A.NO. 2129 OF 2004.
( Judgment of the Bench delivered byHon’ble The Chief Justcie )
Dt: 30.12.2004.