Telangana High Court
WP/35950/2021 of M/s.Sri Rama Retail Outlet Vs Bajaj Finance Limited. on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIO N N0: 35950 OF 202'l Between: 1 . tr//s.sri Rama Retail
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF [DECEIVIBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [UJJAL ][BHUYAN]
AND
THE HONOURABLE [SMT ][JUSTICE P.MADHAVI ][DEVI]
WRIT PETITIO [N ][N0: ][35950 ][OF ][202'l]
Between:
1 . tr//s.sri Rama Retail outlet, [sy.No.168, ][Malpuram ][Village, ][Thirumalagiri,]Nalgonda-508250, [Rep.by its Proprietor Mr'KVS Kumar']Nalgonda-508250, [Rep.by its Proprietor Mr'KVS Kumar']
2.Mr.KVSKumar,S/o.RamaSwamy,Aged40years,occ.Business,F/o.3.8-429'- Fr6i n".os, Surv6oav,botony, Mahso6rabad,-L B'Nagar' Hvderabad-074'
...PETITIONER'S
AND
Baiai Finance Limited., [rep.bV ][its ][Authorized ][officer, ][Branch ][office. ][4th ][Floor, ][6-];-dr'1';;; B9z ihJe;rrdd"i", [Rajbhavan ][Road, Near ][Somajiguda ][circle']Hyderabad-082
..RESPONDENT
Petition under [Article ][226 o1 ][lhe ][constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstanCeS [stated ][in the ][affidaVit ][filed ][therewith, ][the ][High Court may ][be. ][pleased]to [pass ]order [or ][orders more particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature of ][Writ ][of ][Mandamus ][or];;; ;1;"; appropriate [writ, order ][or ][direction declaring ][the ][proceedings initiated ][bv]therespondentpursuanttothePossessionNoticedt..ll.ll.202lissuedunder.".tionts(4)underSARFAESlAct,2002inrespectofapplicationscheduleof;r"f"rtV, [u. ][Nrtt ][and ][void, ][illegal and ][arbitrary ][and ][in ][violation ][of ][provisions ][of]SARFAESI Act [and conseiuentiy ][set ][aside ][the ][possession ][Notice ][dt.1l.11.2021],.tr"a UV the respondent [under ][Section ][13 (a) ][of ][SARFAESI ][Act' ][in ][the ][interest of]justice.
IA NO:1 OF 2021
PetitionunderSectionl5lcPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit [filed ][in support ][of ][the ][petition, ][tne ][Hlgh ][Court may ][be pleased ][to ][stay ][all]irrtfl"l- [pto"u"dings ]['of ][irte ][,"ipondent ][pursuant ][to ][the ][Possession ][Notice]dt.11..1 1.2021 [issued ][unoei ][sectiori 13 ][(4) ][under SARFAESI ][Ac|,2002 in ][respect ][of]S.A. schedule [property, ][in ][the circumstances ][of ][the case']
Counsel for the [Petitioner's: ][Ms. ][P'HAMSA ][DURGA]
Counsel for [the Respondent: ][NONE ][APPEARED]
The Court made the [following: ][ORDER]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [UJJAL ][BHUYAN]AND
HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE [P. ][MADTIAVI ][DEVI]
W.P.No.35950 of 2021
Ordef Pr Hon't!t Sn .l*ta [l:1ja/ ][Bhtlanl]
Fleard Ms. P.Hamsa Durg, Iearned courtscl [for ]thc petitioner.2. Against the possession nolice dared 11.1'1.2021, issued by [the]respondent under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation [and]Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of [Security]Interest Act, 2002 (for short the SARFAESI Act), petitioners [have]filed Securitisation Application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Actbefore the Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, I{yderabad (for short 'theTribunal'), u.hich has been numbered as S.A.I.ll.No.1115 of 2021.
3. ln paragraph 7 of thc supporting afFrdavit, pctitioners have statedthat some persons claiming to be thc agents of respondent/Bank cameto thc properw of tl.rc pctitioners on 16.12.2021 ar.rd dcn'rarrdcd thepetitioners to vacate and hand over posscssion o[ the secured asset.Faced with the above threat, the present Wnt l)crition has been hled.4. Learned counsel for the pet-itioner submits that office ofPresiding Officer in the Tribunal is vacant and therefore, there is noregular functioning of the Tribunal.
5. Since the petitioner has already availed the statutory remedyunder Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, rve are of the view- that itwould be just and proper if the peritioner pursues his remcdy before the'I'ribunal. Ilorvever, since the [-I'ribunal ]is not functional, rve direct that petitioner shall pay 15o/o of the outstanding dues to the respondentwithin a period of 30 days lrom todav.
6. Subject to such pa)rment, the possession notice dated 11.11.2021,q//d thc pcutior-rcr, slrall r-rot bc gri'cn cflcct trt. Iforvevcr, if thcrc [is ][arry]default on the part ol the pctruoncr, rcspondent [rvould ]be at [liberry ][to]take action lor recovcry as pcr las'.
7 . Writ Petition1Saccordingly, disposed o[. Related interim application is also disposed oL
8. No costs.
SD/. --' N. [.' ]CHANDRA [SEKHAR ][RAO]ASSISTANTREGISTRARLtrSECTION [OFFICER]
//TRUE [COPY//]
To,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Authorized [Officer, Branch Office' Bajaj ][Financ-e- ][Limited" ][4th Floor' ][6-3-891]and 8e2, [The ][Belvedere"'li;i[rra-v;; ][il"d'hear ][Somaiisuda Circle']Hyderabad-082.and 8e2, [The ][Belvedere"'li;i[rra-v;; ][il"d'hear ][Somaiisuda Circle']Hyderabad-082.
2. One [CC ][to ][Ms. P ][HAMSA ][DURGA ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]
3. Two [CD coPies']
4. One [spare ][coPY]
GB\*zNPJ
HIGH COURT
UB,JPMD,J
DATED:3011212021
1ri[E ][STAIT]i z7 [JAll?ti?z ][:']ORDERWP.No.35950 of 2021---..---'
DISPOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS.
d-