Telangana High Court
WP/28455/2007 of M/s. Diamond Hacheries Pvt. Ltd. A Company incorporated Vs Tahsildar, Hathnoora Mandal, on 31 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.28455 of 2007 Between: M/s.Diamond Hacheries Private Limited. .. PETITIONER and The Tahsildar and another. .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.28455 of 2007 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that
Between:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.28455 of 2007
M/s.Diamond Hacheries Private Limited.
.. PETITIONER
and
The Tahsildar and another.
.. RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.28455 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is the case of the petitioner that against the order passed by theTahsildar, Hathnoora Mandal, Medak District, dated 12-11-2007, in resumingthe land admeasuring Ac.7-12 gts. in Sy.No.79 situated at Kodipak Village,Hathnoora Mandal, Medak District, on the ground that the said land wasoriginally assigned in favour of one Sri Sanjay Mukeet and the said assigneetransferred the said land in favour of the petitioner in violation of Sub-Section(2) of Section 3 of A.P.Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977,the petitioner filed an appeal along with stay application before the 2[nd]respondent on 26-11-2007 and the appeal is numbered as 4072/2007. It isstated that pending disposal of the appeal, the Tahsildar, Hathnoora Mandal,Medak District, is taking steps to dispossess the petitioner from the land inquestion.
As the appeal is pending, without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case, I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to direct the 2[nd]respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal itself.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd]respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal No.4072/07, which is filedagainst the order of the 1[st] respondent, dated 12-11-2007, as expeditiouslyas possible, in accordance with law. Pending disposal of the appeal, status-quo obtaining as on today with regard to the possession of the land inquestion shall be maintained. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________31-12-2007
Prv