Telangana High Court
WP/16395/2011 of The Gram Panchayat Vs The Panchayat Secretary on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH wRtT PET|TION NO.1639s OF 2011 Between: The Gram Panchayat, Poodur Village, Medchal Mandal, R.R.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECETUBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
wRtT PET|TION NO.1639s OF 2011
Between:
The Gram Panchayat, Poodur Village, Medchal Mandal, [R.R. District. Rep. ][by ][its]Sarpanch, Mr. N. Narasimha Reddy.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Poodur, Medchal Mandal,Poodur, R.R.District.Poodur, R.R.District.
2. The Commissioner Panchayat Raj and Rural Employment, [Government ][of]Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Hyderabad.Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Hyderabad.
3. Mr. Talla Muralidher Reddy, S/o. T. Sanjeeva [Reddy ][Business ][Rl/o. ][Poodur]Village, Medchal Mandal, R.R. District.Village, Medchal Mandal, R.R. District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petitlon under Article 226 of lhe Constitution [of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit [filed ][therewith, ][the ][High ][Court may ][be]pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more [particularly ]one [in ][the ][nature ][of]WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action [of ][the ][1st ][Respondent ][in ][stopping]construction of 90 KL Over Head Storage [Reservoir ][water ][tank, in the ][Gram]Kantam land of Poodur Village, Medchal [Mandal, ][R.R. ][District, as ][per ][letter ][dt.]19-05-2011, being illegal, arbitrary, [without ][jurisdiction ][being contrary ][to ][Sec. ][30]and 32 of Andhra Pradesh Panchayat [Raj ][Act, ][1994, and consequently direct ][the]respondent to implement the Resolution of [the Writ ][Petitioner ][dt. ][6-04-201 ][1,]forthwith in the interests of [justice.]
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WPM P. NO: 19665 0F 2011)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tostay the letter dt' 19'os-2o11 of the 1st Respondent, pending disposar of theabove Writ petitioner, in the interests of justice.in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tostay the letter dt' 19'os-2o11 of the 1st Respondent, pending disposar of theabove Writ petitioner, in the interests of justice.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2011 WVM P. NO: 2363 OF 20111
Between:
Talla Muralidhar Reddy, S/o.. T. Sanjeeva Reddy, Aged about 25 years, Occ:
Business, Rl/o. Poodur Village, Medchal'Mandal, C.-i. drstnct.
....pETtTtONERy3.d RESPoNDENT
AND
1. its The Gram Sarpanch, Mr. [panchavat, ]l.i. Narasimna poodur Village, Medchal Mandal, R.R. District. Rep. nejjv.' [---""' ]["]by
... RESPON DENTA,VRIT PETITIONE R2. Ihe Panchayat Secretary,Gram Panchayat, poodur, Medchal Mandal,Poodur, R.R. District.Poodur, R.R. District.
3. Andhra Pradesh Ihq Commissioner Secretariat,- [panc.hayat ]HyOeriOaO.faj and Rural Employment, Govemment of
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased toin the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased tovacate the interim order dated 16.06.2011 made in w.p.M.p.No.19665 of 2o11 inW.P.No.16395 ot 2O11.W.P.No.16395 ot 2O11.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI pOTTIGARI SRTDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI KISHORE RAO PUSKURU,S.C. FOR TS ZILLA PARISHADS
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI p. VENUGOPAL
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATHWRIT PETITIONNo.l6395 of207tORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing the Iearned Standing Counsel for petitoner submits that thecause in the present Writ petition does not sunive andthereby the Writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the aforementioned submission, the WritPetition is dismissed as infructuous.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
3. As sequei to it, Miscellaneous petitions pending, ifany, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
SD/. K. VENKAIAH//rRUE cOPYil [AsslsrANr ][*sP*o*]
To,
sEcTloN oFFICER
1. One CC to SRt pOTTtGARt SRIDHAR REDDY, Advocate tOpUCltOpUCl 2' one cc to SRr KrsHoRE RAo pusKURU, s.c. for TS Zira parishads IoPUCI
3' T\^/o ccs to Gp for panchayat Raj-and Rurar Deveropment, High court for theState of Tetangana at HydeiabaO.'tOUt'- [- -"]State of Tetangana at HydeiabaO.'tOUt'- [- -"]
4. One CC to SRt p. VENUGOPAL, Advocate tOpUCl
5. Two CD Copies
MP
GJPk\$'
II
>.
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
1[EI.AN]t.!fso(,ulrUJQ-t-LJE6Aof-doc"Jau,*q$c rt9-
ORDER
WP.No.16395 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS