Telangana High Court
WP/38690/2013 of RAMAVATH MANGTHA, Vs District Collector and Programme Coordinator on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRT PETITION No.38690 of 2013 Between: Ramavath Mangtha PETITIONER AND 1. District Collector and Programme Coordinator, MGNREGS – A.P., Nalgonda District, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: Though the petitioner has challenged the order placing him under suspension
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
WRT PETITION No.38690 of 2013
Between:
Ramavath Mangtha
PETITIONER
AND
1. District Collector and Programme Coordinator, MGNREGS –A.P., Nalgonda District, and others.A.P., Nalgonda District, and others.
RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Though the petitioner has challenged the order placing himunder suspension pending enquiry in the writ petition, during thecourse of hearing Smt. P. Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel for thepetitioner would seek a limited relief to direct the 3[rd] respondent-Project Director to conclude the disciplinary enquiry within a timeframe. Hence this writ petition is disposed of with the consent of boththe learned counsel.
2 The petitioner is alleged to have committed several irregularitiesand acts of misappropriation of amounts while working as fieldassistant of Malla Reddy Palli Village, Chinthapally Mandal, NalgondaDistrict. The petitioner, therefore, has been placed under suspensionpending enquiry by order dated 3.07.2013. The petitioner states thatthere is no progress in the enquiry though he has already submittedexplanation on 16.09.2013. It is further stated that the 3[rd] respondent isnot likely to conclude the enquiry within a reasonable time, and if theenquiry is prolonged, the petitioner would suffer hardship. It is,therefore, submitted that a direction be issued for expeditiousconclusion of the enquiry within a time frame.
3 Sri M.S Ramachandra Murthy, who has taken notice on behalf ofrespondent No.3, has no objection to grant such a limited direction.
4 In view of the above, without disturbing the order dated3.07.2013 and expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, thiswrit petition is disposed of directing the 3[rd] respondent-Project Directorto conclude the enquiry and pass final orders pursuant to theproceedings No.E2-1/443/D.V.C/2013, dated 3.07.2013, asexpeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. As a sequel, W.P.M.Ps, if any, shall stand closed.
30[th] December, 2013Js
_____________________
JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI