Telangana High Court

WP/39922/2014 of Palle Shiva Shankar Reddy, S/o. Pulla Reddy, Vs The Principal Secretary (Revenue), State of on 30 December 2014

Cites 0, Cited by 0

P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No. 39922 of 2014 Date : 30.12.2014 Between : Palle Shiv Shankar Reddy S/o Pulla Reddy Plot No. 504, S S Residency, Proddaturu town, YSR Kadapa dist … Petitioner and The Principal Secretary (Revenue) State of A P Secretariat building , Hyderabad and others

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

WRIT PETITION No. 39922 of 2014

Date : 30.12.2014

Between :Palle Shiv Shankar Reddy S/o Pulla ReddyPlot No. 504, S S Residency,Proddaturu town, YSR Kadapa dist … Petitioner

and

The Principal Secretary (Revenue)State of A PSecretariat building , Hyderabad and others … Respondents The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAOWRIT PETITION No. 39922 of 2014

Vendors of petitioner claim to be owners and in possession andenjoyment of the house property D No.2/244, in an extent of Ac.0.07, WardNo.2 in Survey No.17, Dorasanipalli village, Proddaturu mandal, YSRKadapa district. Vendors of petitioner claim to have purchased the samevide registered sale deed document No. 5025/1996 dated 2.11.1996. Petitioner claims that it is a private property. Petitioner contends that hewants to purchase the same when he intended to present deed ofconveyance for registration, Sub Registrar refused to receive and register thedocument.

Learned counsel for petitioner contends that it is illegal on the part ofthe Sub Registrar even to refuse t o receive and process the deed ofconveyance at the threshold and it is without power or jurisdiction. However, no material is placed on record to show that such document isplaced before the Sub Registrar and Sub Registrar refused the same.

Having regard to the same, liberty is granted to the petitioner to presentthe document before the Sub Registrar with all relevant material in support ofhis claim and as and when such document is presented, Sub Registrar shallreceive and process the same in accordance with Registration Act, 1908, andthe Indian Stamp Act, 1899. If Sub Registrar is not agreeing to register thedocument, he shall pass orders assigning reasons and communicate thesame to the petitioner within three weeks from the date of presentation of thedocument.

Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Having regard tothe same, miscellaneous petitions are closed.

_______________

P.NAVEEN RAO,J

DATE: 30.12.2014

TVK

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

WRIT PETITION No. 39922 of 2014Date : 30.12.2014

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead