Telangana High Court
CRLP/6752/2019 of Pochugari Shravan Reddy and 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana and another on 29 December 2023
COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER cRl P 52 20'l [ 3251 I RESPONDENT o Between: AND 'i::,:ufl ilL:xl"Ej)5,ff#i,3%,1?,1?i?."[10,il#il"o'fl ,.ffi
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FORTHE ][STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE [TWENTY ][NINTH DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENryTHREE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE K.SURENDER]
cRlPo5220'l
Between:
'i::,:ufl [ilL:xl"Ej)5,ff#i,3%,1?,1?i?."[10,il#il"o'fl ][,.ffi ]['"[''3f;]
R6ddy District.
2. Smt. Pochugaari [Bhagyamma, ][Wo ][Narsimha. ][[e!dy ][Aoed 51 ][vears' ][Occ:]Asriculture [Rvo ][cummaorilil?iil'd", ][lfiiiil;d;i ][$isaheaov ][District']Asriculture [Rvo ][cummaorilil?iil'd", ][lfiiiil;d;i ][$isaheaov ][District']
'lrTlY'a:"lxtlflXft [,["',X'r9,]11?'B#:i"i,f 8,ff ][*1]]ff ]['jl""eg:i:l]'[ltanOat, Sanga ReddY District'[ltanOat, Sanga ReddY District 'n:,:utru:1ril,5:li:ffi:3i[fj?,]:1f [xil,:e$x'J,Ax?"i3J""6,1'^"","&]oiskict.oiskict.
...PETITIONERS/ACcUSED [Nos'1 ][to ][4]
AND
1The State of Telangana [represented ][by ][its Public ][Prosecutor' ][High ][Court ][of]Telangana at [HYderabad.]Telangana at [HYderabad.]
RESPONDENT
2.Smt.MeesalaShanthamma,WoMallaReddyAged39vear.SC(Madiga)occ: Agriculture [nvo ][cti.tfiiiiii ][iinis"' ][A'id ][lriandal' Sanga Reddy ][District]...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO [COMPLAINANT]occ: Agriculture [nvo ][cti.tfiiiiii ][iinis"' ][A'id ][lriandal' Sanga Reddy ][District]...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO [COMPLAINANT]
Petition under [section 482 ][of ][cr,P.C ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances]statedintheMemorandumotcrounosofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybe oleased to.Quash [tne ][pr#Jingt ][in ][sC-Sf-S'c, ]!o' [19 ][of ][2019 ][on ][the ][file ][of]In"""cTri"oi-tri-sp"iirr [s"..i""i ][L"rrt ][for ][Triat ][oj ][ca.ses ][filed ][under ][scs ][and]ii.ip"b ni,1s-dgirr-v [Adiiiion ][r ][oi.tri"t ][and sessions ][court ][Medak District]at Sanga Reddy.
t.A. NO: I OF [2019]
PetitionUnderSection4S2ofCr.P'Cprayingthatinthecirdmstancesstated in the Memorandum [of ][Grounds ][of ][criminal ][Petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may]be pleased to stay [all ][and further ][proceed-ings ][including ][appearances ][of ][the]petiiioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 in SC-ST-S.C. No. 19 of 2019 on the [file ][of the]court or the special [sessions ][court ][for ][Trial ][of cases filed ][under SCs and ][STs](PoA) Act, 1989- cum-V Additional [District and Sessions ][court ][Medak District at]Sanga Reddy.
This Petition coming [on ][for ][hearing, ][upon ][perusing ][the ][Memorandum ][of]Grounds of criminal [Petition ][and ][upon hearing ][the ][arguments ][of ][sri ][PoDILA]VENKAT SWAMY, [Advocate ][for ][the ][Petitioner being ][not ][present and ][the ][Public]Prosecutor for the state [of ][Telangana ][on ][behalf ][of the ][Respondent ][No.'l ][and]None Appeared for the [Respondent No.z]
The Gourt made the [following: ][ORDER]
\
\
THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE K.SURENDERCRIMINAL PETITION No.6752 of 2079
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of theCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by thepetitionery'accused Nos.1 to 4 to quash the proceedings inS.C.No.19 of 2019 on the file of the Special Sessions Court forTrial of Cases under SCs/STs (POA) Act, 1989-cum-VAdditional District and Sessions ]udge, Medak Dishict atSanga Reddy, registered for the offences against accused arepunishable under Sections 323,504 of Indian Penal Code andSection 3 (1) (0 (r) (s) of SCs/STs (POA) Amendment Act-2015.
2. Heard learned counsel for the respondent No.2-State and perused the record.
3. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners. appeared on behalf of the petitioners. of the petitioners. the petitioners. The statusstatusof the case in the trial Court is not known. This Court by None appeared on behalf of the petitioners. appeared on behalf of the petitioners. of the petitioners. the petitioners. The statusstatus order, dated 25.70.2019, directed personal notice to be servedon respondent No.2. No m-emo is filed with proof of service of notice. In the said circumstances, this Court is not inclinedto keep the Criminal petition pending.
4Accordinglp this Criminal petition is dismissed.
Miscellaneous applications pending, il any, in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. VENKAIAHASSTSTANT REGISTRAR\USECTION OFFICER
//TRUE [GOPY//]
To
1. The Special [Sessions Court for Trial ][of ][Cases ][filed ][under SCs and ][STs]t-eag-cum-v-AJdiiional District and Sessions court Medak' ii;Ai;;i, District at [Sanga ][ReddY.]z. i*o cb"io [tnJ ][pruti" ][prosecutor, ][High ][court ][for ][the ][state ][of Telangana at]Hyderabad [(OUT)]e iie Siaiion House [ofiicer, ][Shivampet ][Police ][Station'.Medak District']+. o"L-cc to [sRl. PoDILAVENKAIswAMY,'Advocate ][[oPUc]]5. Two CD [CoPies]
*'i$o--
HIGH COURTDATED: [2911212023]
ORDERCRLP.No.6752 [ot ][2019]
DISMISSING [THE ][CRL.PETITION]
9'*
Ul i .rt\--I