Telangana High Court
CRLP/15360/2013 of Mukesh Singh Vs The State of A.P., rep. by its P.P. on 30 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRL.P. NO:15360 of 2013 Between: Mukesh Singh S/o. Kishore Singh ..... Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State of A.P., rep. by its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABADMONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAOCRL.P. NO:15360 of 2013
Between:
Mukesh Singh S/o. Kishore Singh
AND
..... Petitioner/Accused No.1
The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad.
.....Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C., prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filedherein, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner onbail pending trial into crime No.796 of 2013 of Panjagutta PoliceStation, Hyderabad in the interest of justice.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing thepetition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri Nali Seshu Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Addl.Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner-AccusedNo.1 under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal ProcedureCode seeking bail in Crime No.796 of 2013 of Punjagutta PoliceStation, Hyderabad, registered for the offence punishable underSections 420, 417 and 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner – Accused and the learned Additional PublicProsecutor representing the respondent-state.
3. It is alleged against the petitioner that by promising tomarry the de facto complainant he developed physical contactwith her, she became pregnant and he gave some pills and got the pregnancy terminated twice. Petitioner has been in judicialcustody since 04.12.2013. Material part of investigation in thiscase is completed. Hence, I am inclined to release the petitioneron bail with certain conditions.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and thepetitioner-accused No.1 is therefore ordered to be released onbail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for the like sumeach to the satisfaction of the learned XIV Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. He shall report before theInvestigating Officer on every Wednesday between 9.00 a.m. and12.00 noon until filing of charge sheet.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
2. The V Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.3. The Station House Officer, Punjagutta Police Station,Hyderabad.3. The Station House Officer, Punjagutta Police Station,Hyderabad.
4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Chanchalguda,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)(OUT)
6. One CC to Sri Nali Seshu Kumar, Advocate (OPUC)
7. One Spare Copy
HIGH COURT
AB
DRAFTED ON 30-12-2013
RKRJ
DATE: 30-12-2013
ORDER
CRL.P. NO. 15360 OF 2013
BAIL