Telangana High Court
WP/2638/2019 of N SIVAIAH Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2021
THE ST s o;",I i 3,I5,3i l|l3ji:,fli Ar HvDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIR rwo rn o tj's'll5ffr J ffiY. ffi ;st,,e en PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PE TITION NO :26s80F2019 Between: 1. N Sivaiah,. S/o N Laxmaiah Aged about 62xurmioaa viraju, Vr'.r,",u,
H'GH COURT FOR THE ST
THE STs o;",I i 3,I5,3i l|l3ji:,fli Ar HvDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRrwo rn o rn o o en
THIRrwo rn o rn o o tj's'll5ffr J ffiY. ffi ;st,,e PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PE TITION NO:26s80F2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. N Sivaiah,. S/o N Laxmaiah Aged about 6262Aged about 6262xurmioaa viraju, Vr'.r,",u, Aged about 6262xurmioaa viraju, Vr'.r,",u, r,,rrr"oiinl"""g:'*".i0'r"Bl'+,$,nisil]l,lr',1; 2. N Balrai, S/o N Laxmaia,h.Aged Svt:te2-61,Villase. [yacharam ]Mandat R"*s; about 64 years, Agriculturist, R;;;y 6iriiiiti ,eransana stareRt/o 2_61, KurmiddaVillase. [yacharam ]Mandat R"*s; about 64 years, Agriculturist, R;;;y 6iriiiiti ,eransana stareRt/o 2_61, Kurmidda
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telanoana Represented by its principal ''Secretary, RevenueDepartment, SecretarTat, HyoerSoio, fet;s'r;;. ' [' ]The Manag]ng Director of rerangana rndustriar rnfrastructure corporation TSIC,Department, SecretarTat, HyoerSoio, fet;s'r;;. ' [' ]The Manag]ng Director of rerangana rndustriar rnfrastructure corporation TSIC,ParisramaBhavan,Basheerbaghi,nyOeriOiO. [--"]
.)The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.
4The Joint District collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapoor, Hyderabad.
5The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Saroornagar, Hyderabad.
The Assistant Director of Survey, setflement and Land Records Ranoa ReddvDistrict Collectorate Campound, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.District Collectorate Campound, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.7The Tahsildar, Yacharam lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, direction or an order more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofl\,4andamus by invoking Article 226 of Constitution of lndia declaring the action of theaction of the Respondents ih not considering the [representation ][of ][the ][Petitioners]Dated 14.5.2018 and thereafter also [seeking enhancement ][of the ][compensation]issued to them on acquiring the [petitioners agricultural ][land ][by ][resuming ][the]Assi$ned lands allotted to the [petitioners Years back ][for ][establishing ][the ][Hyderabad]Green Pharma without [giving them ][the ][fair ][compensation ][compared ][to ][the ][other]adjacent Villager farmers [lands where ][two ][lakhs more money than ][what is ][given ][to]the petitioners and also [without ][there ][being proper ][Survey ][of ][lands ][under occupation]members of [the ][Petitioners thereby denying proper computation ][of ][the]of the family land is illegal unlawful and against [constitution ][Articles ][14,21 ][and ][300-A apart ][from]in total violation The Land [Acquisition Rehabilitation ][and ][Resettlement ][Act ][2013]consequently direct the [Respondents ][to ][enhance ][and ][disburse ][the ][compensation]amount to the [petitioners ]on [par with ][their ][adjacent Kandukuru Mandal ][Utlapalli]Villagers where 10 lakhs is [given ][as ][compensation and ][also ][direct ][to ][the ][Respondent]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, direction or an order more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofl\,4andamus by invoking Article 226 of Constitution of lndia declaring the action of theaction of the Respondents ih not considering the [representation ][of ][the ][Petitioners]Dated 14.5.2018 and thereafter also [seeking enhancement ][of the ][compensation]issued to them on acquiring the [petitioners agricultural ][land ][by ][resuming ][the]Assi$ned lands allotted to the [petitioners Years back ][for ][establishing ][the ][Hyderabad]Green Pharma without [giving them ][the ][fair ][compensation ][compared ][to ][the ][other]adjacent Villager farmers [lands where ][two ][lakhs more money than ][what is ][given ][to]the petitioners and also [without ][there ][being proper ][Survey ][of ][lands ][under occupation]members of [the ][Petitioners thereby denying proper computation ][of ][the]of the family land is illegal unlawful and against [constitution ][Articles ][14,21 ][and ][300-A apart ][from]in total violation The Land [Acquisition Rehabilitation ][and ][Resettlement ][Act ][2013]consequently direct the [Respondents ][to ][enhance ][and ][disburse ][the ][compensation]amount to the [petitioners ]on [par with ][their ][adjacent Kandukuru Mandal ][Utlapalli]Villagers where 10 lakhs is [given ][as ][compensation and ][also ][direct ][to ][the ][Respondent]
to Compute [the ][Comper ][sation ][as ][per ][the ][Land ][Acquisition ][Rehabilitation ][and]Resettlement [Act ][2013a ][rd ][pay ][the ][difference amount ][also' ][further direct ][the]Respondents [to ][determin ][I the actual lands ][under ][the ][occupation ][of the ][Petitioners]and their [family ][membe ][rs ][possession ][by ][conducting ][a ][Re-survey ][by ][the ][6th]Respondent [Assistant ][Dir ][)ctor ][of ][Survey Department into ][the ][Acquired lands for ][the]Hyderabad [Green ][Pharr ][ra ][by ][the ][Respondents ][and ][thereby ][do ][jLrstice ][to ][the]Petitioners.
I
lA NO: 1 OF
Petition under [Ser ][tion ][15't ][cPC ][praying ][that in the ][circum{itances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed [in ][supp' ][,rt ][of ][the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may be ][prleased ][direct ][the]2nd respondent to consi( [er ][the ][representation of ][the ][Petitioner dated ][14.5-2018 ][and]dispose the same immec ately [as ][per law pending disposal of the above ][writ ][petition]and to [pass ]such other c'der [or ][orders as ][this ][Hon'ble Court ][may ][cleerns ][fit ][just ][and]proper in the circumstan:es of the case. [pending ]disposal of the above writ [petition]and to pass Counsel for the Petition, rs: SRI D. SURESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respon, lent Nos. 1, 3 to 7: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Responr lent No.2: SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, S,C. FOR T.S.l.l.C.
The Court made the foll< wing: ORDER
Q8qF8
THE HON'BTE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMART
Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter dated 28.12.2021into the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writpetition. Learned counsel reiterates the said request in the open Couft.In view of the same, the writ petitjon is dismissed as withdrawn.petition. Learned counsel reiterates the said request in the open Couft.In view of the same, the writ petitjon is dismissed as withdrawn.Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the llght ofthis final order. No order as to costs,this final order. No order as to costs, SD/.K.SAILESHIASSISTANT REGISTRAR6
//TRUE COPY//
\To,To,
SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SRI D. SURESH KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. [OUT]2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy, S.C. for T.S.l.l.C. (OPUC)
4. Two CD Copies.
5. One Spare Copy.
IVPTR (')
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:31 [11212021]
ORDERWP.No.2638 [of ][2019]
5. IAT€ O6bf'Yni lrntszz 1s ?)t) 4;l* //,+.- \itv ,'rf:./,.d59;/
DISMISSING [THT][ WRIT ][PETITION ][AS WITHDRAWN]rlWITHOUT [COST],