Telangana High Court
WP/25760/2009 of N. Ramashekar, Vs The Superintendent of Police, on 31 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.25760 of 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. This writ petition is filed declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in harassing the petitioner by calling him to the
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25760 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.
This writ petition is filed declaring the action of respondents 2 and3 in harassing the petitioner by calling him to the police station andinsisting him to sell his Plot No.10 in Sy.No.6 to an extent of 240 sq.yards situated at Dinnadevarapadu Village, Kurnool District.
Learned Government Pleader produced instructions, which read as follows:- “It is submitted that pursuant to the privatecomplaint lodged by the petitioner before the Hon’bleJudicial First Class Magistrate, Kurnool and as referred tothe Station House Officer, Kurnool II Town Police Station acase in Cr.No.269 of 2010 under Sections 405, 417, 420IPC r/w Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. has been registered on24.07.2010 against K.Annapurna @ Anuradha W/oK.Anjaneyulu on the file of Kurnool II Town Police Station,and took up the investigation.
The sum and substance of private complaint isthat, K.Annapurna @ Anuradha/accused had borrowed asum of Rs.40,000/- from the complainant by entering intoagreement of simple mortgage by keeping an unalienableproperty as a security and deceived and cheated thecomplainant. During the course of investigation thepetitioner has been examined as Lws 1 and his detailedstatement had been recorded. After completion ofInvestigation and after obtaining permission from the SubDivisional Police Officer, Kurnool vide C.No.393/SDPO-K/2010 dated 20.09.2010 and after serving notice to thecomplainant, final report has been filed as “CIVILNATURE” on 22.10.2010 before the concerned court.
It is submitted that, except referring the abovecrime, as civil in nature, this respondent did not call thepetitioner to the police station and did not harass andinterfere with the property of the petitioner at any point oftime.”
In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writpetition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. The miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order asto costs.
_____________________________
(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
31.12.2014
Prv