Telangana High Court
WP/29254/2019 of U. Raju, Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others on 31 December 2019
P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.29254 OF 2019 Date: 31.12.2019 Between: U Raju S/o Narsimha aged about 39 years R/o H No 11 St colony Rayavaram Nagarkurnool District erstwhile Mahaboob Nagar District Presently residing at H No 17-177/ A Srinagar colony Nagarkurnool district …..Petitioner
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.29254 OF 2019
Date: 31.12.2019
Between:
U Raju S/o Narsimha aged about 39 years R/o H No 11 St colony Rayavaram Nagarkurnool District erstwhile Mahaboob Nagar District Presently residing at H No 17-177/A Srinagar colony Nagarkurnool district
…..Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana and 4 others represented by its Principal Secretary Muncipality Deparment Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad.
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.29254 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioner contested as Councilor to Ward No.20 of Nagarkurnool Nagar Panchayat in the elections held in the year 2014. Alleging that petitioner did not file election expenditure, order was passed on 2.06.2017 by the State Election Commission declaring the petitioner as ineligible for three years from the date of issue of that order to contest any election to be held for any Office under the provisions of Telangana Municipalities Act, 1965.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State Election Commission. Learned counsel appearing for State Election Commission agrees that subject matter of the writ petition is covered by the decision of learned single judge of this Court rendered in W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch.
3. From the reading of the order impugned, it is apparent that no prior notice was issued before passing such order and notice was not issued within reasonable time from the date of conclusion of election process.
4. In W.P.No.2630 of 2018 and batch, learned single Judge of this Court considered the issue in detail and held such action of the State Election Commission in disqualifying the candidates on the ground that they did not file election expenditure in the elections held in the year 2014 after long lapse of time as illegal, and amounts to arbitrary exercise of power, and set aside the similar orders passed against the petitioners therein.
5. Following the earlier orders of this Court, this Writ Petition is also allowed by setting aside the order impugned. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.
Date: 31.12.2019 tvk
___________________________
JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
tvk
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.29254 OF 2019
Date: 31.12.2019