Telangana High Court
CRLP/11044/2009 of Palavalasa Raja Sekhar , Rajesh, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11044 OF 2009 Between: Palavalasa Raja Sekhar @ Rajesh & 3 others ……Petitioners –
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.11044 OF 2009
Between:
Palavalasa Raja Sekhar @ Rajesh & 3 others
……Petitioners – Accused Nos.1 to 4
AND
The State of A.P.,through the Station House Officer,Balijipeta Police Station,Vizianagaram District,Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another .....Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
CRIMINAL PETITION No.11044 OF 2009
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners, accused Nos.1 to 4 respectively, seeking to quash theproceedings against them in Crime No.62 of 2009 of Balijipeta PoliceStation, Vizianagaram District, registered for the offences underSections 307, 326, 324 & 342 read with 34 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 307, 326, 324 & 342 read with 34 IPC and the victim has lostan eye in the incident.
4. Though there is delay in giving complaint, the reason for thesame appears to be that the victim was unconscious for 2 – 3 daysafter the incident.
5. In the circumstances, it is not a case, where it can be heldthat there is no prima facie case to quash the impugned proceedings. Hence, I see no grounds to entertain this petition.
6. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at theadmission stage itself. The petitioners may approach the appropriateCourt for bail.
____________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J
December 31, 2009.PV