Telangana High Court
WP/20638/2004 of Madhucon Projects Ltd, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 20638 of 2004 Between: Madhucon Projects Ltd, Madhucon House, 1129/ A , Road No.36, Hitec
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 20638 of 2004
Between:
Madhucon Projects Ltd, Madhucon House,1129/A, Road No.36, Hitec City Road, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -500 033, reptd by its Vide President, Madhucon Projects Ltd,Dr.N. Janakiram S/o N.V. Suryanarayana Murthy Garu, R/o Hyderabad.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
rep. by the Principal Secretary to the Government, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Engineer-in-Chief, (Irrigation), Jalasoudha Building, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus, calling for the records relating to and in connection with theAmendment No. ENC/Irrigation/Genl/2004-2, dated 27-10-2004 issued by therespondent No.2,namely , the Engineer-in-Chief (Irrigation), Jalasoudha Building,Hyderabad and to set aside the same as being illegal, violative of principles of thenatural justice, arbitrary, discriminatory and offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India and opposed to the avowed object of the public policy while meting out unfairtreatment is unreasonable.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.JAGDISH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is represented that as the amendment to the tender conditions issued by thesecond respondent’s proceedings No. ENC/Irrigation/Genl/2004-2 dated 27.10.2004has been rescinded by the proceedings dated 27.12.2004, the cause in the WritPetition does not survive.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
kvrm
____________
30-12-2004
To
1. The Principal Secretary, The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Engineer-in-Chief, (Irrigation), Jalasoudha Building, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
3. 2 CCs to GP for Irrigation and Command Area Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
P4. 2 CD copies.