Telangana High Court
WP/16666/2010 of R.Gopal Reddy Vs District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd., represented by its on 31 December 2024
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEi/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO Between: R.Gopal Reddy, S/o.Jogaiah, Aged about 59 years, Rl/o.Hanamkonda, Warangal
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEi/BERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16666 OF 2010
Between:
R.Gopal Reddy, S/o.Jogaiah, Aged about 59 [years, ][Rl/o.Hanamkonda,]Warangal District, Retired in-Charge Manager of Gudur Branch District Co-op.Central Bank, Warangal.
...PETITIONER
AND
1District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd., represented by its, General Manager,Warangal District, Warangal.Warangal District, Warangal.
2General Manager, District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd.,, Warangal District,Warangal.Warangal.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased lo issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ oflvlandamus declaring the impugned action of the Respondents in continuing thedisciplinary proceedings after superannuation of the Petitioner w.e.f. 3'1.5.2009and not releasing the 240 days earned leave encashment benefit due to thepetitioner on his retirement on superannuaiion as illegal and without jurisdictionand in violation of i Articles 1 4, 16 and 300-A Constitution of lndia andconsequently direct the Respondents to release and pay the 240 days leaveencashment amount due to [petitioner ]forthwith with bank rate of interest from thedate of fell due to thelpetitioner.
l.A. NO;2 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 21005 OF 2010)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedIdirect the Respondents to release and pay the 240 days leave encashmentamount due io the petitioner as per Bank's Memorandum of settlement dt.7.7.2008 and as per Judgment of Hon'ble High Court in similar circumstances inW.P.No.2409 of 2005 dated 9.6.2005.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WVMP. NO: 3390 OF 2010)
Between:
"1. District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd., represented by its, General Manager,Warangal District, Warangal.Warangal District, Warangal.
2. General Manager, District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd.,, Warangal District,Warangal.Warangal.
, ..PETITIONERS/RESPODENTS
AND
R.Gopal Reddy, S/o.Jogaiah, Aged about 59 years, R:/o.Hanamkonda,Warangal District, Retired in-Charge Manager of Gudur Branch District Co-op.Central Bank, Warangal.
..RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedvacate the interim orders dl. 14.07.2010 passed in WPtr,lP No. 21005 ot 2010 inWP No. 16666 of 2010.in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedvacate the interim orders dl. 14.07.2010 passed in WPtr,lP No. 21005 ot 2010 inWP No. 16666 of 2010.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. LAKSHMA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
llt
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAOWRIT PETITION No.16666 OF 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. PingaliLakshmi, learned counsel, representing Mr. S. Laxma Reddy,learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that nofurther orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition.Lakshmi, learned counsel, representing Mr. S. Laxma Reddy,learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that nofurther orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition.
Recording the above submission of the learned counselfor the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed.There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, inthis Writ Petition, sha ll sta nd closed.SD/- V. [KAVITHA]ASANT [R]EGISTRAR//TRUE [COPY//]/SECTION [OFFI CER]l)
To,1. OneCCto [Sri ][S ][LaKshma ][Reddy' ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]2. One [CC to ][Sri Srinivas ][Polavarapu' ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]
3. Two [CD ][CoPies]TJw
HIGH COURTDATED:31 11212024
o[R ][THE ]s t4ORDER;JWP.No.1666620'1003 API. 2wrrr{7'6 [r11rl)][*]l CLOSING THWRIT PETIT!ONWITHOUT COSTSl:),{4&- I
II