Telangana High Court
CC/1181/2022 of Smt K. Ambika Vs Sri D.S Lokesh Kumar, I.A.S on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI J J. h + I CONTEM PTCASE NO: 11810F 2022 Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1g71 to punish the
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE [TWENTY NINTH ][DAY ][OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY ][THREE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SMT ][JUSTICE T.MADHAVI ][DEVI]
CONTEM PTC[ASE ][NO: ][118][10F ][2022]
Contempt [Case ][filed ][under Sections ][10 ][to ][12 ][of ][Contempt of]Courts Act [1g71 ][to ][punish ][the ][respondents ][for ][their ][willful]oi"oo"oi"n"" [and violations ][of the order ][passed by ][this ][Honble ][court]dated: 09.03. [2022 ][in ][WP ][35355/201 ][8]
Between:
1. Smt K. Ambika, [Wo ][K ][Prabhakar Reddy, ][Aged ][46 ][Years' ][Occ]' E;"; FidiA, nvti H No- 4-2-45t1, Attapur, Hvderabad'' E;"; FidiA, nvti H No- 4-2-45t1, Attapur, Hvderabad'
2. ilil, Smt G.Maniu R/; elrr-+, Wo Hyo"rsuda,[G.Penta ][Reddy, ]Rajehdrahagar, Hvderabad'[aged ][47 ].years'. [Occ: ][House]
3. " M/s iiliit"d;Ai"ade,'Plot Priority [Projects, ]No. [n"p-!.y^Y.. ]eo0/46/A, SR Nasar, [gltg:h ][Bahu' Flat ]Hvdera bad'[No' ][513']
...PETITIONERS/ [PETITIONERS]
AND
1. ' Sri D.S Lokesh [Kumar, l.A.S, Commissioner Greater ][Hyderabad]r,arni"ipiLCorporation Tank, Bund Hyderabad, Telanganar,arni"ipiLCorporation Tank, Bund Hyderabad, Telangana
2. Sri K Srinivas-Rao, [Chief ][City ][Planner,Greater ][Hyderabad]- Municipal Corporation Tank,-Bund Hyderabad' Telangana3. Sri V Anil Kumar [l.A.S, Commissioner Endowment ][Department,]Dharmikabhavan,Hyderabad, [Telangana.]- Municipal Corporation Tank,-Bund Hyderabad' Telangana3. Sri V Anil Kumar [l.A.S, Commissioner Endowment ][Department,]Dharmikabhavan,Hyderabad, [Telangana.]
4. Sri V Mohan Rao, [S/o ][V ][Ramachander ][Rao, ][Aged ][51 ][Years, ][Occ.]Eiecutive Officer, Sri [Surya ][Chandra ][Swamy ][Temple Endowment]Department, [Dharmikabhavan, Hyderabad, ][Telangana]Eiecutive Officer, Sri [Surya ][Chandra ][Swamy ][Temple Endowment]Department, [Dharmikabhavan, Hyderabad, ][Telangana]
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
JhJ.+
I
::l.j
f.i[,,'f,;.-i
:i..:r:'
!
IA NO:[1][oF ][2022]
Petition under Section 151 [CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances [stated ][in ][the ][affidavit ][filed ][in support ][of ][the ][petition, ][the]High Court [may ][be ][pleased ][to ][grant ][leave ][to ][initiate ][the ][contempt]proceedings [against ][4th ][respondent]
Counsel [for ][the Petitioner(s):SRl. ][Sourabh Agarwal]
Counsel [for ][the ][Respondent ][No.1 ][and 2: Praveen Kumar Veerjala](sc FoR GHMC)
Counsel [for the ][Respondent No.3: ][GP ][for ][Endowments]
Counsel [for the ][Respondent No.4: ][M/s. ][Jagan ][Mohan Reddy Lotha]The Court [made ][the ][following: ][ORDER]
.',
,{'t-t,iql
:iIif
:
i
-l if.'. i..tr 'l,
i
li
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVICONTEMPT CASE No.Il8L OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Contempt Case is filed seeking punishment to the respondents under Section 1O to 12 of Contempt of Court Act,for violation ald wilful disobedience in implementation of thefinal orders of this Court dated O9.O3.2O22 passed inW.P.No.35355 of 2O 18 and to pass such other order or orders.for violation ald wilful disobedience in implementation of thefinal orders of this Court dated O9.O3.2O22 passed inW.P.No.35355 of 2O 18 and to pass such other order or orders.
2. Learned counsel for the contemnors submitted that theorder of this Court has been complied with and prayed forclosure of the Contempt Case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also confirmedthe said submission.
4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall starrdclosed.closed.
SdI CH.VENKATESDEPUTY REG[ISTRAR]//TRUE [COPY//]
SECTION [OFFICER]
To,
1. One CC [to ][SRI ][SOURABH AGARWAL Advocate ][[OPUC]]
2. One [CC ][to SRI PRAVEEN ][KUMAR ][VEERJALA (SC ][FOR ][GHMC)]
i:$t,
3. One CC to Sri. L.Jagan Mohan Reddy Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to GP for Endowments [OUT][OUT]
5. Two CD CopiesAA ^xzz gh [t\'<]
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 29fl212023
ORDER
CC.No.1181 ot [2022]
THE CONTEMPT CASE ISCLOSED WITHOUT COSTS- *S"tOb ,!({. ,.:1,{ri.:l.$': -,1 F.^i (-Y1.)oto2 [0 ][r,lAB ]zilAa!:!,it*;i',ilF :Dr',TC'\,t,.$:ii.ti.ta{':;. sr. [- ].'.f, [-n,]:.fI