Telangana High Court
WA/2075/2004 of m.Vykunta Lakshmi Narayana Vs Koduru Chidambara Rao on 22 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2075 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
and
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2075 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated28/09/2004 in W.V.M.P NO. 2363 of 2004 and W.P.M.P NO. 16490 of 2004 in WPNO : 12919 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
M.Vykunta Lakshmi Narayana, S/o.Late Gopaiah, S.F.6,Geetanjali Apartments, Tickle Road, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist.
..... APPELLANT
AND
1 Koduru Chidambara Rao, S/o. Late Radha Krishnaiah, R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist. R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist.
2 A.Srilakshmi, w/o.Srinivas Chandra, R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist. R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist.
3 K.Sushma Chandra, D/o.K.S.C.Shekara Rao, R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist. R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist.
4 K.Sai Praneetha, D/o. K.S.C.Shekara Rao, R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), R/o.Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist.
5 The District Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist. Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist.
6 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. Krishna Dist.
7 The Sarpanch, Kolavennu Grampanchayat, Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist. Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist.
(The respondent NO.s5 & 7 are not necessary parties to this Writ Appeal)
.....RESPONDENTS
For the Appellant: MR. ANGURU.NARAYANA RAO, Advocate.For Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4: Mr. C. Ramachandra Raju, Advocate.For Respondent No.6: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV.
This Court in exercise of its letters patent jurisdiction normally does not interfere withsuch interlocutory order as the one passed by the learned single Judge, which isunder appeal before us. The order does not suffer from any legal infirmities requiringour interference. The learned Judge having taken balance of convenience factor intoconsideration came to the right conclusion to make the interim order granted by thisCourt absolute and directed the writ petition to be heard finally. It is brought to ournotice that the writ petition is already listed for hearing before the learned singleJudge.
In such view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere with the interlocutory orderpassed by the learned single Judge.
The Writ Appeal fails and shall accordingly stand dismissed.
(B. Sudershan Reddy, J)
22-12-2004
(M. Narayana Reddy, J)
ks
1 The District Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist. Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist.
2 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. Krishna Dist.
3 The Sarpanch, Kolavennu Grampanchayat, Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist. Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu (M), Krishna Dist.
4 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj andRural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, HyderabadRural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT).
5 Two CD copies.