Telangana High Court
WP/14029/2004 of K.Subramanyam Raju, Vs The Superintending Engineer, on 31 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14029 of 2004 Between: 1. K.Subramanyam Raju, S/o K.Chanagalraju, R/o Anantharajupet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 14029 of 2004
Between:
1. K.Subramanyam Raju, S/o K.Chanagalraju, R/o Anantharajupet Village, H/o Sreenivasanagar, S.R.Nagar Post, Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District
2. K.Prabhavathamma, W/o K.Subramanyam Raju, R/o Anantharajupet Village, H/o Sreenivasanagar, S.R.Nagar Post, Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District
AND
.... PETITIONERS
1. The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Kadapa
2. The Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Kadapa
3. The Deputy Executive Engineer, R & B Sub-Division, Rajampet, Kadapa District
4. The District Collector, Kadapa
5. The Dy. Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Sub-division, Panchayat Raj Dept., Rajampet, Kadapa district ( R5 is impleaded as per court order dt. 18-11-2004 in WPMP 27612 of 2004)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondents in taking steps for formation of a puccaB.T.Road through the lands of the Petitioners situated in Sy.No.1674 ofAnantharajpet Village, H/o Sreenivasanagar, Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District withoutresorting to acquisition under the provisions of land acquisition Act as illegal,irregular, arbitrary, unjustified, unconstitutional and unsustainable and direct theRespondents not to lay any pucca B.T.Road through the lands belonging to thePetitioner in Sy.No.1674 of Anantharajpet Village, H/o Sreenivasanagar, KodurMandal, Kadapa District.
Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.VEERA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
As requested by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition isdismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners are at liberty to pursue appropriateremedies before the Civil Court of Competent jurisdiction in respect of thegrievances urged herein. The dismissal of this Writ Petition does not bar pursuit ofsuch remedies. No order as to costs.
____________
kvrm
To
1. The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Kadapa
2. The Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Kadapa
3. The Deputy Executive Engineer, R & B Sub-Division, Rajampet, Kadapa District
4. The District Collector, Kadapa
5. The Dy. Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Sub-division, Panchayat Raj Dept., Rajampet, Kadapa district
6. 2 CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
7. 2 CD copies.