Telangana High Court

WP/16700/2020 of Smt. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari Vs M/s Bank of Baroda on 31 December 2020

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A ,RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Between: Smt, K. A . Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A,RAJASHEKER REDDYAND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

wRtr PET|TIoN NO. 16700 0F 2020

Between:

Smt, K. A. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39 [years, ]Occ:Business, R/o. H. No.4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally,Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

AND

1lr/is. Bank of Baroda, (erstwhile Vijaya Bank) Regional Office Stressed [Asset]Recovery Branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, #6-1-84/13, I Floor, [Khusru]Jung House, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad.Recovery Branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, #6-1-84/13, I Floor, [Khusru]Jung House, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad.2J. B. Chenna Reddy, S/o. J. Kesava Reddy, [Aged about ]43 [years, ][Occ:]Business, R/o. 201103, Gandhar Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. [Nagar,]Hyderabad.Business, R/o. 201103, Gandhar Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. [Nagar,]Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Page 1 of 3

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of [lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased]to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, [more particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature ][of]writ of I\,4andamus, by declaring the action of the [Respondents especially ][the]Respondent No.1 and his officials [in ][interfering illegally and trying ][to ][dispossess ][the]petitioner with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the [premises ][in which ][a]Fair Price Shop situated at H.No.A-32-102612195, [Tulasi ][Nagar, ][Allwyn ][Colony,]Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District as [being illegal, arbitrary, violative ][of ][principles of]natural [justice ]and also contrary to the [provisions ][of ][the ][securitization ][and]Reconstruction of financial Assets and [enforcement ][of ][Security ][lnterest ][Acl, ][2002]and the Rules made there under [and also ][violative ][of Articles ][14 ][and 300-4 of ][the]Constitution of lnd ia.

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under section 151 cPc [praying ][that in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in_]the affidavit filed in support of [the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct]the Respondent No. 1 not [to ][dispossess ][the ][Petitioner ][from ][the ][schedule ][property]

i.e., the Fair Price Shop situated at H. No. 4-32-102612199, Tulasi Nagar, AllwynColony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District, without following the due procedure of lawand pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

lA NO: 2 OF 2020

Betwee n:

Bank of Baroda, Regional Office Stressed Asset Recovery Branch, Rep. by itsAuthorized Officer, 6-1-84113, I Floor, Khusru Jung House, Secretariat Road,Saifabad, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONERYRESP NO.1

AND

Page 2 of 3

1. lt4rs. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. IVr. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39 years,Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Cbtony,Kukatpa lly, Hyderabad.Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Cbtony,Kukatpa lly, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERR/o.20/103, Gandhar...RESPONDENTSR/o.20/103, Gandhar...RESPONDENTS

2. J. B. Chenna Reddy, Aged about43 years, Occ: Business, R/o.20/103, GandharSahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad.Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad.

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacatethe interim orders dt. 08.10.2020 in l.A. No.'112020.the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacatethe interim orders dt. 08.10.2020 in l.A. No.'112020.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GOTURU KRISHNA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI SRINIVAS CHITTURU

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: [--]

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

Writ Petition No.16700 of 2020

ORDER: [(]Per Sri Justice A. Raiasheker Reddv)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks [permission ]to withdraw thewrit petition as the matter has been settled out of the Court and no furtherorders are required to be [passed ]in the [present ]writ [petition.]

Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn lnterim order [granted ]by this Court on 08.10.2020 shall standvacated. No order as to costs.

IVliscellaneous petitions, if any, [pending ]in this writ [petition ]shallstand dismissed.

SD/.N.GHANDRA [SEKHAR ][RAO]ASSISTANT BEGI9-TRARKL/'/iTRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER

To,1. One CC to [Sri Goturu Krishna ][Rao, ][Advocate-[OPUC]]z'. 6l"e CC io [Sri Srinivas Chitturu, Advocate ][[OPUC]]3. Two CD [CoPies.]N/PO'

HIGH COURT

DATED:31 11212020

ORDER

WP.No.16700 ot [2020]

1Hes14{(o,J06JAI'l202 1za**

DISMISSING THE [WRIT ][PETITION ][AS WITHDRAWN]WITHOUT COSTS

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead