Telangana High Court
WP/16700/2020 of Smt. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari Vs M/s Bank of Baroda on 31 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A ,RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Between: Smt, K. A . Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A,RAJASHEKER REDDYAND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
wRtr PET|TIoN NO. 16700 0F 2020
Between:
Smt, K. A. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39 [years, ]Occ:Business, R/o. H. No.4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally,Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1lr/is. Bank of Baroda, (erstwhile Vijaya Bank) Regional Office Stressed [Asset]Recovery Branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, #6-1-84/13, I Floor, [Khusru]Jung House, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad.Recovery Branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, #6-1-84/13, I Floor, [Khusru]Jung House, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad.2J. B. Chenna Reddy, S/o. J. Kesava Reddy, [Aged about ]43 [years, ][Occ:]Business, R/o. 201103, Gandhar Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. [Nagar,]Hyderabad.Business, R/o. 201103, Gandhar Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. [Nagar,]Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Page 1 of 3
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of [lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased]to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, [more particularly ][one ][in ][the ][nature ][of]writ of I\,4andamus, by declaring the action of the [Respondents especially ][the]Respondent No.1 and his officials [in ][interfering illegally and trying ][to ][dispossess ][the]petitioner with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the [premises ][in which ][a]Fair Price Shop situated at H.No.A-32-102612195, [Tulasi ][Nagar, ][Allwyn ][Colony,]Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District as [being illegal, arbitrary, violative ][of ][principles of]natural [justice ]and also contrary to the [provisions ][of ][the ][securitization ][and]Reconstruction of financial Assets and [enforcement ][of ][Security ][lnterest ][Acl, ][2002]and the Rules made there under [and also ][violative ][of Articles ][14 ][and 300-4 of ][the]Constitution of lnd ia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under section 151 cPc [praying ][that in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in_]the affidavit filed in support of [the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct]the Respondent No. 1 not [to ][dispossess ][the ][Petitioner ][from ][the ][schedule ][property]
i.e., the Fair Price Shop situated at H. No. 4-32-102612199, Tulasi Nagar, AllwynColony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District, without following the due procedure of lawand pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Betwee n:
Bank of Baroda, Regional Office Stressed Asset Recovery Branch, Rep. by itsAuthorized Officer, 6-1-84113, I Floor, Khusru Jung House, Secretariat Road,Saifabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERYRESP NO.1
AND
Page 2 of 3
1. lt4rs. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. IVr. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39 years,Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Cbtony,Kukatpa lly, Hyderabad.Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Cbtony,Kukatpa lly, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERR/o.20/103, Gandhar...RESPONDENTSR/o.20/103, Gandhar...RESPONDENTS
2. J. B. Chenna Reddy, Aged about43 years, Occ: Business, R/o.20/103, GandharSahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad.Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacatethe interim orders dt. 08.10.2020 in l.A. No.'112020.the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacatethe interim orders dt. 08.10.2020 in l.A. No.'112020.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GOTURU KRISHNA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI SRINIVAS CHITTURU
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: [--]
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
Writ Petition No.16700 of 2020
ORDER: [(]Per Sri Justice A. Raiasheker Reddv)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks [permission ]to withdraw thewrit petition as the matter has been settled out of the Court and no furtherorders are required to be [passed ]in the [present ]writ [petition.]
Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn lnterim order [granted ]by this Court on 08.10.2020 shall standvacated. No order as to costs.
IVliscellaneous petitions, if any, [pending ]in this writ [petition ]shallstand dismissed.
SD/.N.GHANDRA [SEKHAR ][RAO]ASSISTANT BEGI9-TRARKL/'/iTRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER
To,1. One CC to [Sri Goturu Krishna ][Rao, ][Advocate-[OPUC]]z'. 6l"e CC io [Sri Srinivas Chitturu, Advocate ][[OPUC]]3. Two CD [CoPies.]N/PO'
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212020
ORDER
WP.No.16700 ot [2020]
1Hes14{(o,J06JAI'l202 1za**
DISMISSING THE [WRIT ][PETITION ][AS WITHDRAWN]WITHOUT COSTS
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…