Telangana High Court
CRLP/1760/2005 of Syed Hashim Ali, Adil Vs Syed Rukmini Jansi Rani on 26 December 2007
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1760 of 2005 Between: 1. Syed Hashim Ali @ Adil S/o Syed Mahaboob Ali 2. Syed Mahaboob Ali S/o Syed
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN: PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: G.V.SEETHAPATHY
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1760 of 2005
Between:
1. Syed Hashim Ali @ Adil S/o Syed Mahaboob Ali
2. Syed Mahaboob Ali S/o Syed Khasim Saheb
3. Syed Halima Begum @ Hasima W/o Syed Mahaboob Ali
4. Syed Seema W/o Hashim Ali @ Adil (Presently Residing at Kuwait)
5. Mahabobullah Khan S/o late Abdul Khasim Khan
.. Petitioners/A-1 to A-5
And
1. Syed Rukmini Jansi Rani W/o Syed Hashim Ali @ Adil, C/o KotlaSatyanarayana Hotel, Peddapuram Road, Samalkota, East GodavariDistrictSatyanarayana Hotel, Peddapuram Road, Samalkota, East GodavariDistrict
2. T h e State of A.P., rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,HyderabadHyderabad …Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying theHigh Court to quash the complaint in C.C. No. 218 of 2004 on the file of the IIIAdditional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada and grant such otherrelief .
The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and thegrounds filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated: 28-4-2005 and22-10-2007 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VedulaVenkatarama, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri N.V.Anantha Krishna,Advocate for the Respondent NO.1, and of the Public Prosecutor, for theRespondent NO.2, the Court made the following;
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“Further arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner andreply arguments of the learned counsel for the respondent are heard. Post on 19-11-2007 ‘for orders’. Interim stay granted earlier is extended till then.”
// TRUE COPY //
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
for ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
HIGH COURTABDRAFTED ON 15-11-2007GVSJDATE: 06-11-2007NOTE: POST ON 19-11-2007ORDERCRL.P. NO. 1760 OF 2005