Telangana High Court
WP/37648/2013 of M/s Atlas Offshore Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Director General of Police, on 30 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.37648 of 2013 Between: M/s. Atlas Offshore Services Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner AND The Director General of Police, Govt.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWOTHOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PresentHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.37648 of 2013
Between:
M/s. Atlas Offshore Services Pvt. Ltd.
.. Petitioner
AND
The Director General of Police,Govt. of A.P., at Hyderabad & 4 others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.37648 of 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Alleging that there was financial misappropriation by theDirectors of the petitioner company, who vacated their office on04.01.2013, the petitioner lodged a complaint bearing FIR No.38of 2013 on 01.07.2013 in III Town Police Station, CCS, KakinadaTown.
2. The case of the petitioner is that even though the crimewas registered, unfortunately there is no progress ininvestigation and deliberately, delay is caused in theinvestigation. On account of the delay, great prejudice iscaused to the petitioner.
3. On instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleaderstates that so far, nine witnesses were examined andstatements are recorded. Some more witnesses are required tobe examined and certain information is also called for andrequests for further time of four weeks to complete theinvestigation.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that on05.12.2013, a representation is submitted to the respondents requesting to provide police protection from others who arelikely to cause injury to his person. The respondents havereceived such representation.
5. In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition isdisposed of directing the Inspector of Police, Kakinada III TownCCS, East Godavari District (4[th] respondent), to complete theinvestigation and to file a report within a period of four (4) weeksfrom the date of receipt of copy of this order and therespondents shall examine the representation submitted by thepetitioner, dated 05.12.2013, and appropriate decision be takenas warranted by law within a period of four (4) weeks from thedate of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order asto costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, ifany, shall stand closed.
_________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 30[th] December, 2013
KL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
KL
Date: 30[th] December, 2013